A filed a suit stating that B had executed a registered sale deed in his favour, but subsequently C claims that B had already executed a gift deed in favour C prior to execution of the sale deed. The gift deed was however registered after the registration of the sale deed. A alleges that the gift deed is executed by procuring antedated stamp, is collusive and void. C contested the suit but did not adduce evidence. A submitted document regarding his title (sale deed) , tax, mutation documents etc but couldn't lead direct evidence to show that the gift deed is collusive and antedated. Can A get the decree?