Brief background:-
This Criminal revision against 125(3) crpc maintenance case has been filed by me as party in person when high court was common for Andhra and telangana in 2017, status- notice served to opposite party and they appointed advocate too, thereafter during bifurcation, my casse was transferred to andhra high court located in Amaravati and thereafter corona came and my case was never listed in amaravati high court except a single development that due to change in place after bifurcation the opponent changed their advocate.
41 days condonation delay petition, interim-stay petition are there with that revision petition, I am not interested in interim-stay now because already long time gone and there is heavy pressure in lower family court for recovering arrears from me so final order is best to close the matter once for all in single shot (it's my personal opinion only)
Revision case grounds concisely:-
1) Suppression of material fact so not entitled for any relief:- Wife's main reason for dumping me was I am impotent so she can't lead her life with me but she suppressed the fact that she already took me to a doctor during police station 498A case mediation and after performing requiste tests, there was no impotence in me was the result, regarding which I am having the mediation paper obtained via R.T.I. from that police station. If required I will go again for any kind of tests even now.
2) High qualification:- She is a 24-25 years old highly qualified B.Tech computers but preferred sittig idle without any reason even after obtaining divorce from me.
3) My salary and my dependents were not considered:- The divorce was granted inspite of my objection to her prime allegation of my imotency so being petrified I filed trassfer petition in high court for transfering the maintenance case and while i was in high court for it's admission the family court closed the maintenance case in their favour by granting the full amount whatever she claimed in the petition without any discussion about my earning and my dependents. Since, my evidence is not over, it's clearly a exparte decision but the family court declined to admit the set aside order petition (simply thrown back to me without even numbering). Subsequently in 2019 I think there is a decision from supreme court stating that when the respondent evidence is not over, it's an exparte decision liable to be set aside on application by the respondenet quoting sufficient reasons (although while filing the revision in high court I filed one some other high court case law but this supereme case law is not in my revision case bundle it was filed in 2017 so I will provide that separately now)
4) Miscellaneous allegations & things are there, I will explain when we meet if required.
Relief:- While filing this revision in 2017, I prayed for set aisde the order or remand back the matter to family court for restarting the trail from where it stopped by reopening my evidence. But we are in 2025 now, she already got re-married and happily leading her life and also it's personally embarassing to me for appearing in trial court contesting against someone else wife practically. So I prefer to close the matter here in high court itself (It's my opinion only)
