Confusion with plaintiffs entitlement

The Court has decided that:

a) The plaintiff is entitled for 1/9th share in the property after partition calculated out of 0.9 guntas.

b) Partition and demarcation has to be done mututally.

c) 0.11 gunta land has to go in the share of defendant No 11 purchased by him/ her.

The court decree is very clear.

Nothing prevents you from clarifying further details from your own advocate.

Thank you both.

Plaintiff's side lawyer says, plaintiff is entitled to get 2.88 guntas as per the judgement/decree/order statement

However, opponent lawyer says plaintiff will get 1 gunta as per the decree

and hence the confusion...

please help to clarify 

thank you again !

Any opinion rendered in this regard will be a misguidance without perusing the judgment and decree, hence if you want to have a second opinion you may better approach any expert advocate of this website or outside with the copies.

Got it...sure,will do sir...thanks for your prompt response. 

Nothing can be presumed to form another opinion and oblige any more on the basis of limited facts posted by you.

Show relevant judgment and decree to another local prudent lawyer for better appreciation of facts / documents, professional advise and necessary proceeding, if you have lost faith in your lawyer.