LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Vikas Malhotra (Executive)     24 July 2013

Attached property

Hi, I am Vikas Malhotra from Chandigarh.

Question - My father purchased a flat in chandigarh around  9 years ago, We are currently living in the same.

We purchases the property legally and it was transferred to my father's name after following proper procedure with the chandigarh housing board. Suddenly , officials from Punjab National Bank(assets recovery branch,delhi) visit our property and tell us that the previous owner had a loan pending and this property is attached and will be auctioned.. 

Since we had enquired about the property from various sources and even the Chandigarh housing board had nothing against the same, we went on with the purchase process.. If the property was attached,, the bank should have followed a procedure and marked it as " not for sale" with the chandigarh housing board..

We filed a case in DRT,delhi and it was desided in our favor. The bank was directed to get hold of the previous owner since he was the one who had not paid the loan..

We had a sigh of relief untill the bank appealed in high court.. Now the case is under hearing and the bank officials are demanding 25 lacs from us as settlement.. Why should we pay if we have purchased the property legally..??  My family is facing too much harrassment as it is the only house we live in.. We have to visit delhi frequently for hearings... Is it not negligence on part of the bank,, that they did not foloow a procedure for attachemnt...

My question is -  if the property was attached,, how come the sale of the same was poosible and how come chandigarh housing board had all the clearance.. The bank never reached any authority in chandigarh to claim its right on the property.. It is negligence on part of the bank,, then why should i suffer..??

Is there any rule which can take us out of this mess..??



 2 Replies

Advocate Rohit (Advocate)     24 July 2013

if the bank loan is defaulted nine year ago, then the bank should have taken the legal recourse within 3 years from the date of NPA/loan otherwise it shall be barred by law a per limitation period.

 

Does the bank has got the original documents of the flat????? if they have given the loan then they should be having the original papaers of the property.

 

Regards,

Advocate Rohit Dalmia

9324538481

Mumbai

Vikas Malhotra (Executive)     24 July 2013

Sir,

The bank has no papers or documents regarding the said property.. My father instead has the sale deed and transfer papers in his name with all the receipts from chandigarh housing board.. The main defaulter is still alive and has other properties in his name too.. is it possible that my house can be released from attachment and the drt or the bank should get in touch with the main defaulter instead of harassing my father..


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register