Female foeticide is not a gender problem. It is a human problem. Every person, either male or female or neutral, having sensitive heart bothers about this criminal offence perpetrated by our society against the foeticide. It is not a blame game - always blaming the mother for female foeticide, after knowing fully aware in Indian society, female's role of deciding the family matters is less. It is also true, some mothers are allowing the female foeticide of their own womb, as they know how traumatised a woman's life in our country. If the laws are so much favourable to women, if there is no harassment of dowry, if women are put on high pedestal and are treated very honourably, then there should be no female foeticide. The existence of female foeticide itself is ample proof how miserable a woman's life is.
Arup, you are a quack. You do not have any legal qualification. Even then you give advice, that also wrong advice many times. You do not read judgments. That is known by your answers. Youu just paste from bare Acts and pose just like a famous family lawyer. You do not know, whether DV is a civil law or criminal law. You do not know what is quasi? If you will be in any foreign country, for giving legal advice, without having any legal qualification, you will be sent to jail.
Arup, you are also double tongued. If SIFF says some thing, you sing chorus with them. If two or three women say same thing, you get stomach upsets.
You do not have any practical court experience. You fought only one case in your life. There also you lost. Instead of accepting your foolishness in your defeat, you always weep that the judge who gave judgment is corrupt. You weep that the court reader mischieved you while typing down your deposition and you blindly signed on the deposition without reading it.
You have personal problem. You could not manage your wife. Then start to weep about all women. You insult all women saying that they married only to get maintenance. If you say the same thing standing on your street, every woman on the street will garland you with chappals for insulting them. You give illegal advice of "live-in" and give false propoganda that Supreme Court allowed it. You do not know the consequences of live-in and go on talking about Section 497 (adultery) and go on preaching the men to have s*xual relationship with unmarried woman and divorcee to avoid the offence of adultery, and pose that you invented a new law.
Roshani once said about you, you cannot understand English, you cannot express yourself in English and saying something to you is banging head to the wall.
I hope you talk some sense in future instead of showing your foolishness in five to six posts on single thread.