An area of 4.89 acres of land (which includes 54 cents in Survey No. 186/1 and 1.09 acres of land in Survey No. 186/2, in all 1.63 acres, which is the subject matter of this appeal) in Koyambedu Village, Chennai District was notified for acquisition ..
The appellant herein was the defendant in the suit filed by the respondent seeking for a decree for possession and future mesne profits with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and for payment of Rs.4,500/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum ..
This public interest litigation petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing Respondent No.1, Respondent Nos.2 to 13 and Respondent Nos.27 to 44 to put in a place a transparent and fair pr..
Dematerialization request-Application of Regulation 54(5) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996 -Whether the Adjudicating Officer was justified in imposing penalty on the Appellant company? ..
Calculation of offer price in indirect acquisition-Application of The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997- Whether the Securities and Exchange Board of India was justified in cons..
Acquisition of shares-Board directed the Appellants to work out the offer price of the shares with reference to three dates namely, November 30, 2009, May 29, 2010 and June 7, 2010- whether or not the Board erred in directing the Appellants to recalc..
Refusal of the information without giving any exemption under Section 8(1) of the Right to Information Act 2005- Whether PIO had any reasonable cause to offer for refusing to obey the directions of the Commission for providing the information. ..
Compensation for harassment and unnecessary humiliation- Whether deemed PI Os were guilty for not supplying the complete required information ? ..
Section 4 in The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 Section 9 in The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920..
This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28/03/2008 in W.P. No. 474/1982 of the High Court of Delhi wherein the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent-1 and whereby resolution and order dated 14th January, 19..
Both the writ petitioners were formerly members of the Samajwadi Party, of which Shri Mulayam Singh Yadav is the President. While Shri Amar Singh was one of the senior-most members of the party and had also held the post of All India General Secretar..
The petitioner before us in the present case is a widow Pushpa Vanti, whose husband was an army major who had fought in three wars (in 1948, 1962 and 1965) and was decorated with fourteen medals. However, the petitioner is getting only Rs.80/- per mo..
Chet Ram Gangwar S/O Shri Puran Lal Gangwar vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary..
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 49 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 10(2) in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894..
Ram Chandra vs State Of U.P. And Ors..
Limitation - Suit for Correction of Date of Birth - Respondent No.1 Assistant District Attorney sought for Correction of date of birth after 9 years of joining of service - Respondent No.1 took more than three years to serve the Notice under Section..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
