The court observed that normally the complainant has the right to choose any court having jurisdiction and the accused cannot dictate where the case against him should be tried...
Supreme Court considered the view that the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts to try the civil Suits with respect to the lands, which were subjected to ceiling proceedings under the Act, are held to be impliedly barred, since the Act excludes the juris..
Under Section 13 of CPC, a foreign judgment is not conclusive as to any matter thereby directly adjudicated upon between the parties if (a) it has not been pronounced by a court of competent jurisdiction; (b) it has not been given on the merits of th..
The Supreme Court held that under Section 9 of the Code, the civil court shall have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature and one has the right to bring a suit of civil nature of one’s choice however frivolous the claim may be, unless it i..
The Supreme Court is empowered at any stage to transfer any suit, appeal or other proceeding from a High Court or other Civil Court in one State to a High Court or other Civil Court of another State if it is satisfied that such an Order is expedien..
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal. The impugned judgement of the division bench of HC was set aside and the order of the single learned Judge was restored. It was held that the objective of the prohibition in Section 10 is to prevent the courts fr..
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal. The impugned orders were set aside and the statements filed by the defendant were taken off record. It was held that the time period of 120 days is mandatory in nature subsequent to the amendment in Order VIII Ru..
As far as the first concerned was raised that whether the case should be tried by the civil court or the revenue court, the Bench took the reference of Section 230, Agra Tenancy Act of 1926, which states that all suits which fall within the purview o..
The Bombay High Court contended that the mere fact that the summons in the criminal case was served upon the plaintiff at a particular place would not confer jurisdiction upon the Court of the place where such service was affected. In this view of th..
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal. It was observed that the delay in process of serving notices has resulted into arrears in courts. Therefore, it was ordered that notices can be served by e-mail. This facility was provided in commercial cases and..
..
Just recently, a three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in North Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs Kavinder and Others in Civil Appeal No. 232 of 2020 delivered on July 21, 2020 has observed that Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree is not eq..
High Court dismissed the appeal of the applicant stating that the decision given by the trial court that the suits were not maintainable and yet keeping them pending was itself an exercise of jurisdiction with a material irregularity...
Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Advocate, appearing on behalf of the appellants has contended that having regard to the circumstances of the case, the High Court was not justified in passing the decree against the appellants...
The court held that summons have to be issued to the petitioner on whose petition the order for winding up was made. It is implicit that if the directions which have to be given by the court would affect any person prejudicially hemust be served with..
The appeal was dismissed and the bench gave a decision to uphold the orders of both the Courts..
The Supreme Court of India showed its concern about all the industries/establishments, employees and workers through its judgement. It duly noted that all industries/ establishments are of different nature and have different capacity, including finan..
Under the constitutional set-up, no person may be deprived of his right or liberty except in due course of and by authority of law: if a member of the executive seeks to deprive a citizen of his right or liberty otherwise than in exercise of power de..
The court observed that the words "to contradict him" appearing in s. 145 of the Evidence Act must carry the same meaning as the words "to contradict such witness" in s. 162 of the Code. Further, the court laid down that the witnesses can be cross-ex..
The court found no substance in the contentions of the appellant whereby it was pleaded that evidence cannot be accepted without having a corroboration of independent witnesses. The court accepted the sole testimony of the victim who was shot with a ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
