Human Rights - Passive Euthanasia and Active Euthanasia - Legality..
Validity of Appointment - High Powered Committee (HPC), duly constituted under proviso to Section 4(1) of Central Vigilance Commission Act 2003 recommended name of 2nd respondent for appointment to post of Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) - Petit..
Service - Preparation of judgments through third party - Removal from service - Legality (i) Whether High Court was justified in dispensing with enquiry while passing order recommending appellant's removal (ii) Whether order of removal ..
Non-Compliance of the Order - Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950 - This Court had directed requisite information to be supplied in prescribed formats to Monitoring Committee for being placed before the Court - 9 States have not given requi..
This appeal has been filed under Section 10 of the Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Special Court Act of 1992’) challenging the order dated 28.11.2005 passed by the S..
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 24.5.2010 in S.B. Election Petition No. 1 of 2009 and I.A. No. 6839 of 2010 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur. By the impugned judgment and order the High Cour..
In a country like ours where discrimination on the ground of caste or religion is a taboo, taking lives of persons belonging to another caste or religion is bound to have a dangerous and reactive effect on the society at large. It strikes at the very..
"To operate as a bar the second prosecution and the consequential punishment thereunder, must be for `the same offence'. The crucial requirement therefore for attracting the Article is that the offences are the same, i.e., they should be identical. I..
"It may, however, be pointed out that this Court was never intended to be a regular court of appeal against orders made by the High Court or the sessions court or the magistrates. It was created for the purpose of laying down the law for the entire c..
This is an appeal against the order dated 16.05.2007 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in C.W.P. No. 17144-CAT of 2001 holding that the respondents, who were working as Senior Dietician and Dietician under the Director Health Services, Chandigarh..
The appellant stands convicted under section 376 read with section 511 of the Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs.2000/- with the direction that in default of payment of fine he would undergo rigorous imp..
Consumer - Medical Negligence - Discovery Rule - Cause of Action - Sections 12, 17, 18, 22 and 24A of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission reversed order of Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal C..
Refusal of Supreme Court to remove certain remarks against Allahabad High Court ..
Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986- Definition of Consumer ..
Rejection of Tribe Claim by The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee ..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
