The present petition impugned the order by which the appellate court had dismissed the appeal of the petitioner against the order whereby the trial court had fixed the maintenance for the petitioner and her daughter at Rs. 10,000/- per month...
The present Petition challenged the judgment and order passed by the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court at Suri, Birbhum. It modified the judgment and order passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Court, Suri, Bir..
The present criminal miscellaneous petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the entire proceedings in connection with the order passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi whereby the Court took cogniz..
The couple, who married on April 17, 1992, divorced in 2015 after the wife filed a cruelty claim in court. Following the divorce, the husband filed a petition seeking perpetual alimony from the wife in the amount of Rs 15,000 per month. ..
Mannar Reddiar and Adhilakshmiammal had a daughter named Kalavathy and two boys named V.M. Chandrasekaran and V.M. Sivakumar. Adhilakshmiammal, the mother, died on August 14, 1995. She left a Will dated January 30, 1995, bequeathing the properties sh..
The petitioner being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 04.08.15, after her application for interim maintenance was declined has subsequently filed an application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. ..
..
..
The present appeal arose from the decision of the appropriate court through which permanent alimony under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was denied. The High Court was to construe provisions related to the determination of income of parties to be asses..
..
..
The present appeal arose from the impugned final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissing the Criminal Revision filed by the petitioner under Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code...
..
In this instant petition, where the petitioner’s wife has challenged the order of the family court dated vide 14th March 2013, where the husband was allowed to reside in a shared household in a plot based in Bandra Mumbai, further it was observed th..
..
In this instant petition where after marriage the petitioner’s in-laws, particularly her father-in-law, husband, and brother-in-law, did not approve of the dowry items and expressed dissatisfaction that they were not given a Hero Honda and Rs. 50,000..
..
The present appeal arose out of the order passed by theHigh Court of Uttarakhand in a writ petition.The order directed the State (here petitioner) to pay and release the salary to the petitioners (here respondents) at par with Allopathic and Dental M..
In sum, the Allahabad High Court has left no stone unturned to make it absolutely clear in this landmark judgment that advocates need to be in continuous practice for 7 years on date of application to seek appointment as District Judge. ..
In the present petition by the petitioner (accused), it was prayed to declare that Sections 29 and 30 of the POCSO Act were unconstitutional. They were contended to be violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. Further the petitioner wa..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
