..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
While batting very strongly in favour of permitting, preserving and protecting the legal rights of the accused under POCSO Act, the Delhi High Court has in a most learned, laudable, landmark and latest oral judgment titled Sushil Kumar vs The State G..
In a petition submitted in accordance with Article 226 of the Indian Constitution, the petitioner asks for a number of reliefs. These consist of the right to respond to a show cause notice, the suspension of the order's implementation and recovery pr..
Rule 8(2) of the aforementioned Rules grants the government the authority to make exceptions to the rules in cases where strict adherence would result in undue hardship...
The Supreme court considered that the application had been filed on August 2, 2004, and as a result, it did not find any compelling reasons to excuse the delay in filing the application...
The agreement was amended twice. First was related to changes in the rates of commission while the second one dated 01.01.2008 declared the first amendment as null and void...
While ruling on a most significant legal point pertaining directly to the maintenance of women, the Madras High Court in a most robust, rational and remarkable judgment titled S Amalraj Vs State and Another in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15704 of 2018 and Crl.M.P..
..
..
..
..
..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
