..
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka could modify order dated 13.2.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 15348/2008 without issuing notice and giving opportunity of hearing to the appellants, who claim to h..
Indian Drugs & Pharmaceutical Ltd. Versus Famy Care & Ors. - The respondent, Famy Care Company is engaged in the business of manufacture and supply of family planning products including Oral Contraceptives Pills (hereinafter “OCPs”). They have been s..
The main question is whether relief of reinstatement and back wages granted to respondent nos. 1 to 14 (for short, ‘the workmen’) is justified. The facts leading up to this appeal by special leave are few and simple. The workmen were enrolled with th..
In these two appeals the appellants are aggrieved by the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) in Appeal No.3/2007 dated October 31, 2007. The present Appeal No. 805 of 2008 is at the insta..
These two appeals, by special leave, are concerned with the liability of the appellants to pay ESI contribution in respect of the workers employed by the contractors in performance of the contract awarded to them for transportation of milk. The two a..
The relevant facts briefly are that the Government of Pondicherry, Planning & Development Department, made the Assistant Engineers (including Deputy Director of Public Works Department) Group ‘B’ (Technical) Recruitment Rules, 1965 [for short ‘the Re..
Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the plaintiffs claimed that Puttathayamma was wife of Sivaramaiah who pre-deceased her in 1950. Puttathayamma died on 15.11.1979. She had four children. Lalithamma (daughter) who died in 1990, was the ori..
The appellant is a private limited company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act. It seeks to challenge two recovery certificates issued by the Managing Director of the U.P. Small Industries Corporation Ltd. (a government corporation) i..
This matter concerns an assortment of questions regarding the interpretation and constitutionality of certain provisions of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999, and as such calls for our utmost attention, particularly in view of the ..
Two main questions arise for consideration – first, as to the meaning of the expression, ‘amount due from a buyer, together with the amount of interest’ under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancilla..
Whether Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (for short, ‘the Limitation Act’) can be invoked by this Court for allowing the aggrieved person to file an appeal under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, ‘the Electricity Act’) after ..
Whether it is imperative for the assessee-Bank to close the individual account of each of it's debtors in it's books or a mere reduction in the Loans and Advances or Debtors on the asset side of it's Balance Sheet to the extent of the provision for b..
With the consent of counsel appearing for the parties, the matters are heard for final disposal. By this judgment we will dispose of all the aforenoticed appeals as common question of law on somewhat similar facts arises for consideration of this Cou..
The present appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India is directed against the Judgment dated 29th February, 2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur in S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No.92 of 2007, and i..
We may notice necessary facts giving rise to the present appeal. Vehicle No. RJ-19G-3661 was carrying `parchun’ materials and in addition 377 pieces of drum bucket paints. These goods were transported from Ughna (Surat) to Jodhpur under Bilty No. 014..
The material facts of the case are: Late Mr. M. Ramachandran, the father of the 1st appellant as also of the plaintiff-respondent, had three sons, namely, Balathandayutham (1st appellant), Ezhilarasan (plaintiff-respondent) and one Gnanavoli and two ..
On 18th December, 2008, when some of the cases in the present batch came for hearing before a Division Bench of this Court to which one of us, Kapadia, J., was a party, the Division Bench of this Court found that some of the High Courts before which ..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
