The question for determination, therefore, is as to whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the mandatory order as passed by the Division Bench was justified, or whether the learned Single Judge having exercised his discretion appropriat..
In these civil appeals, we are required to consider essentially the erstwhile legislations with regard to the administration of property left behind in India by evacuees migrated to Pakistan during partition and the compensatory redistribution of the..
The appellant herein is the transferee of leasehold rights of the land to an extent of 25 acres in Survey No. 336/1A1 (75 acres in total) of Aletti village of Sullia Taluk, Dakshnia Kannada district. The original order of lease grant was made in the ..
Appellants had challenged the validity and propriety of a Circular issued by the Director General of Civil Aviation, (hereinafter called as `DGCA’), respondent No.1 dated 29.5.2008, to the effect that Civil Aviation Requirements(hereinafter called as..
This is an appeal against the order dated 03.04.2008 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing the writ petition CWP No.5587 of 2008 of the appellant challenging his termination from service under the Shiromani Gurudwara Prabhandhak Committe..
Writ Appeal No. 963 of 2000 filed by the appellants against the order of the learned Single Judge, who declined to interfere with the order passed by Land Tribunal, Gulbarga (for short, “the Tribunal”) for grant of occupancy rights to the respondents..
Refusing to grant four reliefs sought, namely, (1) to grant mandatory temporary injunction directing the respondent No. 1 herein to act under Clause 32(ii) of Memorandum and Rules and Regulations (“Regulations” for short) of the respondent No. 1 by a..
Application for permission to file SLP in SLP [C] No.11799/2011 [CC No.1066/2010] is allowed and delay condoned...
The principal question raised in this appeal is the constitutional validity of Section 347D of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as, `the said Act'). ..
As asserted by the appellants, the suit land (Original Suit No.164/76) falls under Survey No.129/64. The respondents No.1, 2 and 3 were the original plaintiffs and according to them the suit land falls in Survey No.129/55. ..
This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 12.08.2009 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in C.W.P. No. 2948 of 2008 wherein the Division Bench of the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the respon..
The Bihar Municipal Act, 2007, like other Municipal Acts, provides for the election of the Municipal Councillors, the Mayor or Chief Councillor and the Deputy Mayor/Deputy Chief Councillor. It also provides for an Empowered Standing Committee to exer..
This appeal is focused animadverting upon the judgment and order dated 21.4.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. ..
During the hearing of the writ petition several issues were identified regarding the Petitioners' right to force the Company to execute the 3additional work of constructing the Viaduct which was neither within the scope of the work nor within the sch..
This petition has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 27.07.2010 by which the High Court has upheld the conviction of the petitioner by the trial court. ..
The only question which arises for consideration in these appeals is whether the Board of Revenue, U.P. could hear and decide the revisions filed by the appellant after creation of the State of Uttranchal (renamed as Uttrakhand) by the Uttar Pradesh ..
This Special Leave Petition was filed against an interim order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (for short "National Commission") on May 18, 2004 in Revision Petition No.3183 of 2003 filed there, on behalf of t..
This appeal is directed against the judgment passed by a Division Bench of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court by which it has allowed the intra-court appeal filed by respondent No.1, set aside the judgment and order passed by a single Judge of the High C..
These two appeals, though coming from separate judgments and orders passed by the Bombay High Court, arise from the same suit for eviction instituted by the landlord which figures in both the appeals as respondent no.1. The appellant in the appeal ar..
The respondents filed a suit against the appellants in the year 2000 for recovery of possession of the suit premises and mesne profits. The said suit was decreed on 23.8.2003 in so far as the prayer for possession. The prayer for mesne profits was re..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
