No particular amount for maintenance can be fixed by the Act as the amount may differ from case to case. The Courts have to fix the amount of maintenance considering all the circumstances of both the parties...
In the judgment of the case – Sunil Rathee & others v. The State of Haryana & Others, delivered on July 23, 2020, the Supreme Court has explained two conditions, based on which the Apex-Court can withdraw a case from a High Court to itself, exercisin..
The petition was dismissed as there was no merits in the review petition...
In a well-balanced, well-reasoned, well-analysed and well-worded judgment, a two Judge Bench of the Principal Bench at Jabalpur of Madhya Pradesh High Court comprising of Justice Sanjay Yadav and Justice Atul Sreedharan in its judgment titled In Re..
It has to be stated right at the outset that in a major and significant development, the Bombay High Court in a recent, remarkable and righteous decision titled “Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited Vs Teleone Consumer Product Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.” in ..
"Section 96 and 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure provide for preferring an appeal from any original decree or from decree in appeal respectively. The aforesaid provisions do not enumerate the categories of persons who can file an appeal. However, i..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the right of the board to appeal in High Court as the right to appeal was available to the respondent at the time of initiation of the dispute before the amendment which wasn’t preserved thereof...
The Court first clarified the word "property" used in Section 17 and held that it includes properties. The court reiterated that interpretation of word "portion of the property" cannot only be understood in a limited and restrictive sense of being po..
By examining the case, the High Court reversed it’s decision on the judgment which was already given by the Trial Court, stating that the Learned trial court interpreted Section 10 wrongly, as the plaintiff has taken all measures in issuing letters a..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision of the High Court that the civil court didn’t have the territorial jurisdiction to try the said suit...
Delhi High court didn’t have the jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed...
The court held that the High court should not have shown indulgence of such magnitude by adjourning the matter when the counsel for the appellant was not present. It is difficult to envision why the Court directed fresh notice to the appellant when t..
In a well-balanced, well-reasoned, well-analysed and well-articulated judgment, the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Abhishek Kumar Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh in Cr.MP(M) No. 1017 of 2020 delivered on July 30, 2020 has made it absolutely cle..
In a remarkable, righteous and recent judgment titled “Shailendra Swarup vs The Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate” in Criminal Appeal No. 2463 of 2014 delivered just recently on July 27, 2020, the Supreme Court Bench comprising of Justice Asho..
In a recent, remarkable and righteous decision delivered on July 28, 2020, the Apex Court in Parminder Kaur @ P.P. Kaur @ Soni vs State of Punjab in Criminal Appeal No. 283 of 2011 has made it abundantly clear that once a plausible version has been p..
It is most heartening and most refreshing to learn that the Tripura High Court just recently on July 30, 2020 in a notable judgment titled Karnajit De vs. The State of Tripura in AB 87/2020 made no bones in making an important observation in simple ..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision of the High Court that the civil court didn't have the territorial jurisdiction to try the said suit...
In a recent, remarkable and righteous decision titled Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research in Civil Appeal No. 2903 of 2020 (arising out of SLP (C) No. 26349 of 2019) delivered on August 5..
It is quite refreshing and quite reassuring to see that in a recent, remarkable and righteous decision titled "Savitri vs. State of Haryana and others" in Case No. – CRWP-5238-2020 (O&M) delivered on August 19, 2020, a two Judge Bench of the Punjab a..
While dismissing a petition challenging the ban on army officers using social media, the Delhi High Court in Lt Col PK Choudhary Vs Union of India & Ors. in W.P.(C) No. 4181/2020 delivered via video conferencing on August 5, 2020 has observed in no u..
Member Strength 9,48,154 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
