The Supreme Court held that, when the notice is given to the respondent before the hearing of the application for grant of special leave, no objection with respect to the maintainability or granting of the special leave would be permitted at any stag..
..
In the Judgment of Dr. Rohit Kumar vs. Secretary, the Court invoked Article 142 of the Indian Constitution, while granting relief to the petitioner and made it a clear direction in the case that this order will not be treated as a precedent...
This case deals with the scope of Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008...
The petitioner had challenged an order of the High Court that granted relief to the respondents under Section 482 CrPC against criminal proceedings under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477A read with 120B IPC. ..
Appeal was barred under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code as it was opposed as the suit agreement was admitted by the defendants and there was no dispute regarding the identity of the site agreed to sale and the amount of consideration...
The Supreme Court held that the Court has to entertain the suit so filed, even if a part of the dispute, which was the subject matter of the dispute, is under the jurisdiction of the Court...
The Supreme Court was listening to a plea by the Andhra Pradesh Government against the order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that quashed the FIR against the Ministers and Government officials who were allegedly involved in the Amaravati land scam. ..
This Case Is Based On Article 133 Of The Constitution, Where Arbitration Awards Are Challenged..
The Supreme Court affirmed that under Order XXXII, rule 9 of the Original Side Rules of the Calcutta High Court, an Appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution could be admitted either by order of the High Court under Order XLV, rule 8 of the CPC or..
The appeals by New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and the State of Uttar Pradesh raise the issue as to whether the High Court has transcended the limits of its power of judicial review. ..
A Plaint With Defects Of Misjoinder Of Parties Or Misjoinder Of Causes Of Action Cannot Be Barred By Law..
Serving notice of summons is necessary and no order that affects the rights of a party should be heard without providing them with an opportunity to represent the case...
An order of dismissal passed by the appropriate authority is not effective without proper enquiry and communication to the officer concerned...
The Supreme Court held that the High Court proceeded to decide matters on which the Trial Court had recorded no final decision, and that which could not be decided by the High Court until the parties had opportunity to lead evidence thereon. ..
While confirming the accusation, the Supreme Court stated that an accused cannot be discharged for an offence under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code...
The Kerala High Court recently ordered the Bank of India to disburse the petitioner's loan application on the grounds that she was a deserving student and that educational loan repayment options should not be based on the parents' financial situation..
The High Court dismissed the appeal of the applicant stating that the decision given by the Trial Court, that the suits were not maintainable and yet keeping them pending, was itself an exercise of jurisdiction with a material irregularity. ..
The Madras Bar Association filed a writ petition before the Court challenging the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 and Sections 184 and 186 (2) of the Finance Act, 2017 on the grounds that they were against..
The appellant was allowed to appeal as an indigent person after the suit had been dismissed on a merit basis. The order of the High Court passed on May 3, 1982, in C. M. No. 525 of 1981 was set aside and the appeal was accordingly allowed by the Supr..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
