Where business of the undertaking was to manufacture and export readymade garments, the CIT (A) was not justified in holding that profit from forward contract is to be included in the profit of the business of the undertaking for the purposes of comp..
Service - Post of Extra Departmental Branch Post Master - Process of selection - Appellant got selection - Respondent No.5 has been allowed and appointment of the appellant has been set aside..
Regularisation of daily wage workers - employed on daily wage basis in the Irrigation and public Health wings of the Himachal Pradesh Public works Department - Classified as class III and class IV employees who are being paid minimum wages prescribe..
..
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, s. 173 - Matter of fixing the appropriate multiplier and computation of compensation - claimants had questioned the judgment passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Addl. District Judge, Haldwani ..
Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 302 - Appeal against conviction and sentence of life imprisonment - Held, it becomes clear that the appellant is responsible for causing the death of the deceased. However, the application of Section 304 Part II IPC would ..
Constitution of India - Article 136 - Writ petition filed by the petitioner herein has been admitted by High Court of Punjab and Haryana - Grievance that no order on the stay application filed by petitioner has been passed by the High Court - Held, n..
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 2, 93, 987/- with interest on account of dishonoured cheques - Refused to grant leave to defend - Decreed - Application under art. 227 allowed ..
dian Penal Code, s. 302 - Trial Court convicted the accused - High Court recorded acquittal - Appeal against - Held, The respondent is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code...
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka could modify order dated 13.2.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 15348/2008 without issuing notice and giving opportunity of hearing to the appellants, who claim to h..
Mr.Suri had submitted that the entire approach of the Special Court was biased against the appellant simply because the sole proprietor of the appellant was duly notified under the Special Courts Act. We are of the considered opinion that the aforesa..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
