..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
While batting very strongly in favour of permitting, preserving and protecting the legal rights of the accused under POCSO Act, the Delhi High Court has in a most learned, laudable, landmark and latest oral judgment titled Sushil Kumar vs The State G..
In a petition submitted in accordance with Article 226 of the Indian Constitution, the petitioner asks for a number of reliefs. These consist of the right to respond to a show cause notice, the suspension of the order's implementation and recovery pr..
The appeals against the CESTAT order were dismissed due to time-barred demands, as per Civil Appeal 6033 of 2009. The central issues in Civil Appeal Nos. 6033/2009 and 5714/2011 are being adjudicated by this common order...
The SC decided that by failing to check for passenger boarding before signalling the driver, the appellant acted carelessly and negligently. According to Section 338 of the IPC, the offence carries a sentence of up to two years in prison...
Rule 8(2) of the aforementioned Rules grants the government the authority to make exceptions to the rules in cases where strict adherence would result in undue hardship...
Court considered the fatal injuries suffered by the appellant requiring an attendant and awarded compensation of Rs.10,80,000 towards attendant charges...
The Supreme court considered that the application had been filed on August 2, 2004, and as a result, it did not find any compelling reasons to excuse the delay in filing the application...
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
