Respondents applied for post of Assistant Professor in different departments as scheduled caste reserved category candidates. In support of their caste, certificates issued by the States of U.P, Bihar and Tripura were produced. Respondents were succe..
The central question of law arising on the appeal before this Court is whether a notice served with show cause 1 notice under Rule 4(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘..
This appeal is directed against order dated 20.11.2009 passed by the Division Bench of Kerala High Court whereby it allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 and quashed the appointment of the appellant as member of the Kerala State Consumer..
The only question which arises for consideration in this appeal filed against the judgment of the Division Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court is whether the application filed by the appellant under Section 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (fo..
The appellant Man Kaur was the owner of the suit property, a plot admeasuring 1000 sq.yards with the building thereon, identified as ‘Annexe No 508’ situated in Sector-18B, Chandigarh. The respondent-plaintiff was, at all the relevant points of time,..
. The aforesaid question arises in this way. A certain Pradeep Jain (builder) was allegedly eliminated by hired gangsters on March 7, 1995 and his brother Sunil Jain was attempted to be killed on that day for not succumbing to the pressure of parting..
The deceased, Priyadarshini Mattoo, was residing with her parents at B-10/7098, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi and was a student of the LL.B. course at the University of Delhi Campus Law Centre, and had at the relevant time completed the 5th Semester and was..
Cognizance of offence under SC/ST Act directly by special court without case being committal to it by magistrate is illegal...
Court (Justice Karunakaran) Held: (1) Islam not at all oppresses women in any manner whatsoever; nor does it grant license to any man for that matter - let alone a husband - to discriminate, exploit, mistreat or ill-treat any woman either in one’s fa..
The Petitioner, his father, Dhanaram, and mother, Lachhavantin, were tried and convicted for the offence punishable under Section 498-A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and 5 years, res..
The appellant-Shyam Telelink Ltd. was granted a licence under the Indian Telecom Act, 1885 on 4th March, 1998 for providing basic telecom services in Rajasthan Circle. A licence agreement was executed between the parties that, inter alia, required th..
Assessment of Excise Duty - Sale of Shrimps and Shrimps seeds without requisite permission - Section 35(L)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Whether sale by the Assessee without requisite Permission from the Development Commissioner, are to be as..
Arbitral Award - Invalidation of Award passed by Arbitrator of low rank - Scope and interference of Court thereof - Whether Rank of Arbitrator can be a ground to invalidate the Award? ..
Discharge from Service - Voluntary Suppression Scheme - Sections 420 and 406 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Whether the allegations in the complaint make out a case of criminal breach of trust, as defined in Section 405 of the IPC against the App..
The appellant-company holds a licence to provide cellular mobile telephone services for Delhi Metro area. The Licence Agreement executed between the appellant on the one hand and the Government of India on the other, inter alia, provided for payment ..
PW-1 Sudarshan and PW-2 Bhargave, two brothers, were running the Varsha Provision Store, Bijapur situated near the Government Maternity Hospital since the year 1989 after having obtained a license in the name of PW-2. The accusedappellant Narayana wh..
The respondents herein were serving in various districts in the State of Haryana as Constables, Head Constables, Exemptee Head Constables, Assistant Sub-Inspectors and Sub-Inspectors (hereinafter in short as ASI and SI, respectively). They were order..
Being aggrieved by her non-selection, the appellant filed an application (OA No.2406 of 1999) before the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal challenging her non-selection. The appellant contended that the fourth respondent was ineligible for the..
These two appeals by special leave raise common questions of law and shall stand disposed of by this common judgment. The appeals arise out of two separate orders both dated 26.9.2006 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby C.W.Ps. Nos..
The respondent was commissioned in the Indian Army in the Regiment of Artillery on June 23, 1968 in the rank of Second Lieutenant. After grant of Commission, the seniority of the respondent was re-fixed with effect from August 21, 1969. Thus, for the..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
