The appellant has filed this appeal challenging the impugned order of the Kerala High Court dated 17.9.2010 granting bail to the respondent, Dr. Raneef, who is a medical practitioner (dentist) in Ernakulam district in Kerala, and is accused in crime ..
Without making the consignee a party to the suit, is the suit not maintainable ?..
Section 10 stipulates that no suit can be instituted against a common carrier for the loss of a consignment unless a notice is issued within six months from the time when the loss or injury came to the knowledge of the plaintiff..
Section 10 requires a notice in the manner set out therein, for initiation of a proceedings against a common carrier for loss of goods or injury to goods entrusted for carriage...
Whather 138 Attract in case : Account closed by Bank..
Union Of India (Uoi), Owning Southern Railway Represented By General Manager And Anr. vs Tiruchi Metal Works Represented By Its Partner R.M. Sundaram..
Challenge against conviction on the ground that previous sanction to prosecute the Appellant was not legally obtained as required under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ..
Test for determining the patent eligibility of process claims- This case returns to the present court on remand from the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of the Court's decision in Bilski v. Kappos - In the instant case District court..
Conversion of regular appointment to ad hoc appointment, without any show cause notice, Rules nowhere provide that the regular appointments can be converted into ad hoc appointments ..
Refusal of Supreme Court to remove certain remarks against Allahabad High Court ..
Termination of Probationary teachers - no departmental inquiry- Penal in nature ..
Extent of power vested in the Government in reviewing its order granting or refusing sanction to prosecute the public servant in terms of Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. ..
Rejection of Nomination form to contest under OBC reserved category - Two different certificates were issued - Rejection originally on the ground that concerned sub-caste did not fall under OBC category ..
The prosecution in support of its case, relied primarily on the evidence of Dr. A.K. Dwivedi PW-1, who had conducted the post-mortem examination, Executive Magistrate-cum- Tahsildar Vir Bahadur Prasad PW-2, Ram Singh, Advocate, PW-5, Mujur PW-6 and D..