Company Applications No. 578-579/2011 have been filed by the Department of Telecommunication (in short ‘DOT’) under Rules 6 and 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 for recall and stay of this Court’s order dated 5th February, 2010 by virtue of whi..
The Petitioner UBPL states that it is, inter alia, engaged in the manufacturing and selling of pharmaceutical preparations including injections bearing the trade mark FORZID. UBPL claims that since 2002 it took steps to launch CEFTAZIDIME injections ..
Mr. Beri submits that the petitioner-company has not done any business since 2001-2002 and thus, it has not earned any income for the last ten years. He states there is no hope or prospect of the petitioner-company doing any further business as state..
The three appellants are serving life sentences for committing murder of one Dile Ram. They were never on bail and have, thus, completed over ten years of incarceration. We, therefore, intended to grant leave in the case and release the appellants on..
This appeal by Union of India is directed against the final judgment and order dated 12.08.2005 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Special Civil Application No. 16575 of 2005 whereby the High Court dismissed the application of the ap..
Land-sharks are on the prowl and they seem to care little for the battle having shifted from the turf they wish to secure to a court of law. They trade allegations on affidavit just as recklessly as they would resort to every trick not in the book to..
This appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act is at the instance of an assessee and is directed against order dated March 30, 2001, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” Bench, Calcutta, in Income-tax Appeal bearing IT (SS) A No.69/..
This appeal by Union of India is directed against the final judgment and order dated 12.08.2005 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Special Civil Application No. 16575 of 2005 whereby the High Court dismissed the application of the ap..
The Division Bench of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court headed by its Chief Justice held on 21st June 2011, in a group of LPAs filed against different Electricity Companies of the GUVNL, challenging the orders of the single Judge of the same HC, that t..
Supreme Court Dismissed the appeal made under section 19 of the Contempt of Court Act 1971 on finding the Respondent not in guilty...
SC allow appeal on the basis of benefit of doubt & set aside the order of HC for offences punishable u/s 302 & 201 ..
Bail application rejected by HC made by Kanimozhi and Sharad Kumar in 2Gscam..
HC dismissed the appeal and allow the Respondent to collect the penalty..
HC dismissed the appeal against the order of Tribunal on deduction under section 80IB..
HC dismissed the appeal and protect the order of Tribunal on reassessment under section 147..
HC allow the appellant against the order of Tribunal to upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings..
HC order against Appellant on the allowability of liability of interest on damage in breach of export..
HC dismissed the appeal of the appellant and protect the order of Deduction under 80HHC..
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Investigation Circle (20)(1), New Delhi passed order under Section 132(5) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) dated 02.06.1995 declaring that cash found during search as unexplained..
HC allow the appellant and reject the Respondent’s litigation on the question of admissibility of deduction under Section 80IB of the Act...
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
