The court held that that in view of Section 27(1) of the DV Act, the Metropolitan Magistrate court, Bengaluru has the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and take cognizance of the offence and since allegation against the other appellants except ..
The guidelines formulated in the present case are wide enough to address the issues arising due to right to health and health care, however the object of formulating such guidelines will be achieved only if they are implemented effectively. Therefor..
The Supreme Court held that Rummy (a 13-card game) requires certain amount of skill as the cards have to be memorized, there is holding and discarding of cardsand therefore it cannot be said that the game of Rummy is a game of entire chance. As the E..
The CAS upheld the appeal filed by WADA and set aside the decision of NADA Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel. They confirmed that Mhaskar Meghali has committed an Anti-Doping Rule Violation as the athlete was just guessing how the substance must have en..
Judges must take into consideration the earning capacity and monthly salaries of husbands and wives both, before giving the judgment and must order maintenance fairly...
Any restriction imposed upon the fundamental rights of the citizens must be just fair and reasonable. Any unreasonable intrusion into these rights will be ultra vires of the Constitution, as in the present case horse riding which involves substantia..
The court held that by going into the facts of the case it is clear that the appellant was made to sign the deeds by fraud. She believed that she was signing the gift deed. The Court was of the view that HC in its view, rightly held that the remedy o..
The court quoted many judgments of India and International origin namely America, UK and Australia. The court said that mistake in Section 72 has been used without any limitation to its scope and it covers both mistake of fact and mistake of law; and..
The court considered the current contract to be a perfectly valid contract and with good consideration. It was held that plaintiff and other persons interested could sue for the amount subscribed and defendant has to pay the money promised. Hence, th..
Being affected by a disease is no sin or crime. However, adding on to the misery if that disease is communicable the patient will have to distant himself from the fellow beings. This not just affects his mental health but also leaves a traumatic impa..
The Court while dismissing the appeal and upholding the findings of the lower courts, ruled that Bhagwan Kaur cannot be held accountable for preferring her brother over the collaterals of her husband. The contentions of the appellants were observed t..
The court keeping in mind the duty to the husband to maintain the wife has directed the husband to pay the wife under the DV Act as he has a responsibility to allow his wife to live life with dignity according to their social status and strata but ha..
The court held that that in view of Section 27(1) of the DV Act, the Metropolitan Magistrate court, Bengaluru has the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and take cognizance of the offence and since allegation against the other appellants except ..
The court held that the object of grant of maintenance is to afford a subsistence allowance to the wife, who is not able to maintain herself, then the award normally should be from the date of the application. For the court to award maintenance from ..
The court observed, at the time, Respondent having re-married in 1962 prior to the death of Atmaram, it cannot be said that respondent-Rahubai has inherited share of deceased defendant no.1-Atmaram after his death. At that time provisions of Section ..
The Civil Court has the power and jurisdiction to decide the question upon taking appropriate evidence as would be required for passing a declaration in terms of Section 25 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 to disqualify the husband defendant to inhe..
The present case is a landmark Indian case decided by Delhi High Court, which for the first time dealt with the moral rights of an author under the Copyright Act and awarded damages. The judgment gives a new aspect to the right of integrity. It is cl..
In India, the Court for the very first time held that concept note can be a subject matter of copyright protection under the Copyright Act and that it must be ensured that the persons who create an original idea/concept or theme are rewarded for thei..