Dr Sambit Patra vs State of Chhattisgarh - Allegations made against political leaders even if untrue does not constitute an offence under section 505 of IPC...
This is a landmark judgment that revolves around the concept of joint Hindu family and coparcenary rights of the daughters...
The following judgement with the issue of granting of bail in case of serious circumstances of dowry death...
The High court of Delhi warns private doctors and hospitals against providing questionable and sketchy medical reports before the court such acts will be punishable under section 192 of IPC...
The following judgement deals with provision for registration of marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954...
This case is the landmark judgment which is given by the tribunal in NCLAT which magnifies the scope of section-5(21) of Insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016 and clarifies which leased properties can be taken into account under the definition of ‘ope..
This case deals with the dismissal of four petitions because wearing a mask is mandatory even when the person is alone in a vehicle...
In the judgment of the case – Joydeep Majumdar v. Bharti Jaiswal Majumdar delivered on February 26, 2021, a 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court consisting of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari and Hrishikesh Roy, has ruled that in a case w..
In the judgment of the case- Nawal Kishore Sharma v. Union of India & Others, delivered on February 10, 2021, a 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court, consisting of Justices, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari and Hrishikesh Roy have held that a hear..
Through the judgment of the case – Kotak Mahindra Bank Pvt. Ltd. v. Ambuj A. Kasliwal and Others , delivered on February 16, 2021, a 3 -judge bench of the Supreme Court consisting of the Chief Justice Sharad A. Bobde, Justice A.S.Bopanna and Justice ..
In the judgment of the case – N. Vijayakumar v. State of Tamil Nadu, delivered on February 3, 2021, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court, consisting of Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R.Shah, has in its ruling very unambiguously st..
In the judgment of the case – Rajendra Khare v. Swaati Nirkhi and Others, delivered by Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Indu Malhotra, at the Supreme Court on January 28, 2021, have pointed out that the basic philosophy inherent in granting power o..
In the present case, the High Court is dealing with sections 25, 26 and 49 of Indian Partnership Act and section 28 of Limited Liability Partnership Act which lays down provision for liability of partners of a firm. The question before the court is w..
In the present judgement, the case before the high court is concerned with section 53A of Cr.P.C which is related to the subject matter of medical examination of the accused when he is arrested on the charge of commission of rape. The question before..
The court held that it cannot detain the adult girl who had eloped with a man as she had eloped, as she had appeared before the court on her own after a habeas corpus petition had been filed by her father...
A FIR was registered on the complaint of Mohd. Aslam under sec. 147, 148, 149, 457, 435, 436, 454 and 380 of the IPC in Bhajanpura Police Station. The two co accused namely Mukesh and Sunil Sharma were granted bail by the Court vide orders dated on 1..
The Court has made it clear that the appointment of Sole Arbitrator is subject to the declarations being made under section 12 of the Act with respect to independence and impartiality, and the ability to devote sufficient time to complete the arbitra..
In conclusion, the finding of the SC is that the prosecution has established the appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt and no case of acquittal under sections 363 and 366 of the IPC is made out. However, the Court has partly allowed the appeal re..
According to a 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court consisting of Justices Ashok Bhushan, S.Abdul Nazeer and Hemant Gupta .through its judgment of the case – Kiran Devi v. The Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board & Others, delivered on April 5, 2021, any busi..
A 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court consisting of Justices Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee has, in the judgment of the case – Rahna Jalal v. State of Kerala and Another, delivered on December 17, 2020, declared that “..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
