Wife's salary towards household expenses

My wife has expectation that whatever money she earns from her job as lecturer in college, she does not want to spend it at all but keep saving. She expects that I should meet all household expenses.

Such things run on basis of common understanding between husband and wife.

I have been taking care of all household expenses so far, but after she filed fir and dv against me, I do not want to do so anymore but expect her to contribute from her income equally. i.e. 50/50.

If she has filed DV against you then no point in expecting a 50/50 share toward expenditure.

This is because I do not want to stash money to again file a false case against me later. I will take care of anything and everything beyond that since the expenses will be definitely be more than double her salary.

TO live together in harmony there should be understanding.  To part ways via divorce, there too be need of understanding.  So understanding is main need here.  How well your wife understands you, how well you understand your wife will form the basis of survival of mariage.

the mediator is also taking her side on this point in the mediation thru my RCR case.

If you are calling her back and telling her share expenditure 50 50 from now on, then you are doing something illegal.

Asking money from wife amounts to asking dowry, which is a punishable offence.

If you both do not gel together, then its better you part ways, as conditions you put or she put in court of law wont help unite hearts.

Try different method called as love n affection method, here to you cannot force her to love you.  All depends on compatibility.  

TRy to convince her.  Or just move out of mariage via divorce MCD.

A) MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION: Is my wife's standpoint legally right?

Legally you cannot ask wife to pay money for house ka kharcha.  Legally you cannot ask even a rupee from her.  You ask, you go sit in jail.

B) what counter argument can I give?

Nothing.

Sounds very unfair that wife can keep on stashing all money and later on file false cases at will and separate later on.

I dont understand it because of the following logic:

- if wife is earning then time she should be spending taking care of husband, children and kids is used in her job. so husband, home and kids suffer.

- husband has to still pay extra for servant (because wife is working) and other misc stuff......

I dont get it.... what section of law is this? what is the advantage then to marry a working wife?

I will try to give an answer to your last question in bold.

Actually at 62 I really do not see any major difference between a guy wanting to marry a girl who is a working woman or a girl who just wants to be a homemaker.  Both have their own troubles.  But here the law itself has become the troublemaker via the wife.  With laws like these, if one marrys a working woman, the husband will suffer in pain like you do, but on the other hand if a guy marries a homemaker then he is at double the loss, neither the woman works but in turn there is a high possibliity of her filing false cases against husband and in-laws.

Nothing to worry too much about.  Your life or any other male's life is at stake these days.  Patiences wearing thin among the opposite s*x, laws favoring the fairer s*x, some more new laws in the pipeline, one should just pray that one's wife does not get her mind corrupted come what may and the intentions should be to lead a marital life and none else.  Only then the male will feel safe.  

Main culpirt is the older generation who have failed to pass on values to their girl childs and thanks to the growing economy who just nailed the last nail in the coffin called as marriage.  God save you, god save the Indian male.

I am really keen to understand this.

To understand this, it need time.  Say next 5-6 years would have seen the light what Goutam Buddha saw under peepal tree.