LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Roshni B.. (For justice and dignity)     10 March 2011

Wife & her family can't be prosecuted for giving dowry - SC

Relief for women in dowry cases



A woman and her family members cannot be treated as accused under the Dowry Prohibition Act for giving dowry at the time of marriage, the Supreme Court has said. A bench of Justices HS Bedi and CK Prasad upheld the Delhi High Court verdict that quashed a criminal case against a girl stating a dowry harassment victim was protected under the law and, could not be charged under the Act.

Two separate benches of the Delhi HC had taken divergent views on the issue. While Justice SN Dhingra (since retd) held the woman and her family could be prosecuted for giving dowry, Justice Ajit Bharihoke had said it could not be done.

The latter judgment held that section 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act provided protection to the person who was a complainant under the law. Section 3 of the Act makes giving, accepting or abetting dowry an offence.

The SC order clarifies the legal position regarding the culpability of an alleged dowry-giver bride. It dismissed the appeal against Justice Bharihoke’s verdict filed by the husband who claimed that the judge could not have delivered it as the law was settled by Justice Dhingra.

The bench, however, dismissed the petition and said, “The girl is a victim and you want her to be prosecuted also. Then 498A (dowry harassment section) would be rendered nugatory.”

Vijary Aggarwal counsel for the woman who faced the case for giving dowry, contended there should be harmonious construction of the Act.

Justice Bharihoke had in October 2010 quashed a metropolitan magistrate’s order that directed registration of a case under the Act against a woman. The case was registered following a complaint made before the court by the husband.


Cases against women

Delhi police issues circular in 2007 asking its officers to register cases under the Dowry Act against women who marry despite dowry demand

Mar 19, 2010: Delhi court orders case against a woman saying she had willfully given dowry

Dec 4, 2008: Noida court orders case against woman.

GA_googleCreateDomIframe("google_ads_div_ht_story_top_lhs_200x200_ad_container" ,"ht_story_top_lhs_200x200");


 2 Replies

Legal Fighter (Advocate)     10 March 2011

ITEM NO.14                      COURT NO.7             SECTION II

              S U P R E M E        C O U R T   O F    I N D I A
                                RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).1339-1340/2011

(From the judgement and order dated 20/10/2010 in       WP No.
501/2010 & CRLMA No. 3921/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N.

SAMEER SAXENA                                            Petitioner(s)


STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR                              Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned

Date: 07/03/2011      These Petitions were called on for hearing today.


For Petitioner(s)         Mr. Gagan Preet Singh, Adv.
                          Mr. Karan Bir singh, Adv.
                          Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.

For Respondent(s)         Mr.   Vijay Aggarwal, Adv.
                          Mr.   Rajnish Kumar singh, Adv.
                          Mr.   Tanmay Mehta, Adv.
                          Ms.   Manjusha Wadhwa, Adv.

             UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                                 O R D E R

                 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

                 We see no reason to interfere in the Special

             Leave     Petitions       which   are,    accordingly,

    SR. P.A.       COURT MASTER

Tajobsindia (Senior Partner )     11 March 2011

@ Author

JOSH aur HOSH dono missing from this news post as is evident from FULL TEXT of Judgment of Bench reproduced by @ Legal Fighter based on @ Authors false reporting.

Kissi LIC key Ld. Advocate ney sahi kaha tha ki NEWS ITEM ko bina Judgment ke nahi post karna chahiye....I do subscribe to HIS valid reasoning. 

BTW, can we have Author’s full postal address to file ‘defamation” and ‘demurrages’ suit now other than on the News Reporter to ‘publish’ false misleading statement in public domain to mislead general public !!!!!

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Related Threads


Popular Discussion

view more »

Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query