Whether unaided private self financed degree engineering colleges are bound to implement 6th cpc?

You may have to wait for the orders to be passed by the tribunal even for the interim relief  and if the interim relief has been rejected then you can file a review petition before high court in the writ petition  and seek to set aside the tribunal's order and to pass appropriate orders to grant you the relief sought.

Sir, 

My advocate's opinion is that better wait for final order. Because, every Application will cost me legal expert charges.

A direction from High Court to Tribunal for speedy disposal looking at my age, costed me reasonable because the advocate at High Court is young and treated me as elder. High Court has requested to Tribunal to speed up the hearings. Let's wait for best.

There is no point in giving any further opinion to you because you again and again repeat your advocate's opinbion alone and not even trying to follow or understand what has been opined to you by this forum, now since the ball is in your court, you may take a considered decision accordingly

Sir, l am very very sorry if I have hurt the learned lawyers of the forum. In fact, almost same opinions my advocate gives me, but the ground reality is that now my savings have almost dried up. If I press too much, the advocate may give up my case. New advocate may charge almost four times then what I paid 7 years ago.

In fact, I am really obliged to the lawyers who actively participated in the discussions, voluntarily without any expectations. I had almost given up hopes but the forum has revived my hopes. 

Now I close the topic before further hurting your feelings. Whatever outcome is there, I will update. I would like to appreciate the forum at the end of the battle in appropriate manner.

Again, please forgive me if I was little harsh because of my restless efforts to get justice.

Goodbye to all.

You are welcome for your appreciations and understanding, you may update whenever there is one.

Sir, till today there is not a single case in Gujarat in which an employee has  challenged and got arrears. Even Tribunal and government pleaders believe that the AICTE notification of Pay revision are not applicable to SFIs. Supreme Court says that AICTE norms are applicable to SFIs. Let's hope for the best.

I will definitely keep on updating. 

I pressed my advocate for speedy disposal. High Court issued direction to Tribunal to dispose preferably by August.

As you suggested, preferably I may contest my case party in person in High court. 

You can prepare a platform to contest your case yourself by collecting the evidences, preparing the drafts, preparing the arguments on the basis of strong citations in your favor.

Many many thanks Sir, for your kind suggestion. Ground work is already started. Now I have started arranging supporting documents and evidences separately claimwise.

I will keep updating the forum about progress. 

Thanks again.

You can visit this forum with updates whenever there occurs one, thanks for your appreciations.

Sure Sir, I will be in touch with the Forum and also update the progress as and when, if any.

You are always welcome. 

This is in continuation of our discussion of my above grievance.

Finally the case reached at argument stage during February/March 2026. I submitted written arguments with all justifications. In all 12 claims were there.

The Respondent also submitted written arguments in response.

I challenged the Respondent's few arguments by additional written arguments and requested to respond.

On next hearing date, the Respondent did not reply and agreed to issue judgement/order with consent of my Advoctae.

To our surprise, the judgement /order was delivered during April, with Tribunal's conclusion that as the Respondent is SFI and not getting any grant from Government , non of the claims are tenable. Hence the Application was closed.

The question is, If the Respondent did not reply to/challenged my additional arguments and agreed for Order, that means my arguments were valid and the Respondent had no ground to reply/challenge.

Then the judgement should have been my favour. But to our surprise, it was other way round. The Respondent who couldnot challenge/reply my additional arguments, the Tribunal favoured the Respondent. Is it not grave error/ procedural lapse before delivering the judgement? 

I am planning to challenge the Order in High Court after consulting a senior lawyer. He is of the opinion that this is straight forward case to win, but not sure how many years it may take because of the huge backlog at High Court.

KIndly guide with your valuable experience, is it advisible to go for long legal battel. The problem is, I am now 72 years old citizen, spending from retiral savings for legal fight. Where as the Respondent is spending from Public Trust's money.

Which Tribunal? Is it the Administrative Tribunal? If yes, what is the Case No.?

Please upload the Judgment/Order. if possible.

A considered viw can be offered on seeing th judgement