In a divorce case, a respondent has cross-examined of witness of the petitioner. After cross-examination taken by the respondent, he mentioned to court that the cross-examination of the witness is over and the court typed that cross-examination of the witness is over. Now, the respondent wants more examine of the witness (of the petitioner) about new facts.
Question: Can respondent more examine the witness (of the petitioner) about new facts though he mentioned to the court that the cross-examination of the witness is over? If yes then, How?
