Dear all eminent lawyers,
Here is my history in brief :-
- The apartment was in my father name. He transferred it to me via a registered sift deed. However society was not admitting me as a member .
- I had to approach the Deputy Registrar for membership. After 9 months of litigation & hearings the deputy registrar gave the judgement in my favour & instructed the society to admit me as a member.
- After 4 months after the order , the society went to the joint Divisional joint registrar for appeal & asked for delay condonation.
Now in the Revision application the learned lawyer of the opposite side has made these assertions ( the contentious assertions are made in capital by me )
- During the pendency of the said Dispute application the Respondent No 2 WITH COLLUSION of Respondent No 1 USED BACKDOOR TACTICS to obtain the impugned order u/s22(2) of the MCS act 1960 just to harass the applicant society and it's managing committee members.
- It will not be proper to grant membership to him which was DELIBERATELY ignored by the Respondent no 1 authority and passed the impugned order
The LD respondent no 1 has passed the impugned order ILLEGALLY, hasty and without application of mind.
The Ld respondent no 1 has passed the impugned order WITHOUT CONSIDERING AND APPRECIATING BASIC AND FACTUAL POSITION that the society communicated their decision to Respondent no 2
The Ld Respondent no 1 ought to have given sufficient time to the applicant society to file it's reply and defend the case ,and without giving such the Respondent no 1 HIGHHANDEDLY AT THE BEHEST of the Respondent no 2 issued impugned order
That the Respondent no 2 SUPPRESSED THE VITAL AND MATERIAL FACTS AND DID NOT APPROACH WITH CLEAN HANDS before the Respondent no 1 and therefore the Ld Respondent no 1 have no authority to grant relief to Respondent no 2
At any rate the fact remains that the impugned order passed by Respondent no 1 is improper, illegal, bad in law, void-ab-initio untenable and hence liable to be quashed and set aside
Now my queries:
- Everyone has a right to appeal but can he label the quasi judicial authorities as corrupt
Appeal should be on basis of legal points only
- Now how and where can I approach the law on these points? Do I file a civil defamation suit or a criminal defamation suit or something else
- What other legal options are available to me .
Hope to see a lot of responses and many thanks in advance for the same.