This event has been postponed due to some technical issues. All the participants will be informed of the dates when it starts. All the best!
Following are the rules that all the participants need to religiously follow in order to stay in the competition. Non-adherence or violation may result in disqualification without any prior notice.
No plagiarism/copy-pasting. The answers should be unique and in one's own words.
The minimum length of the answer has to be 100 words or more.
The quality and authenticity of each answer shall be analyzed by the LCI quality team individually and the decision of the quality team shall be final. Each qualified answer adds 2 points to your score.
Repetitive answers on the same thread would not add to your scorecard.
Participants have to answer only the unattended queries and not the ones that have already been resolved. The direct link to the unattended queries is here - click here
Plz, keep noting the links of the queries that you have answered so the scores can be matched if needed. To make it easier for us and safer for all, you can drop the links on - email@example.com at the end of the day.
Here is a sample answer for you all to follow - click here
(The legal provisions, case laws and link to an a related LCI article)
Any disrespectful or foul comment in the thread would attract disqualification. The decision of the LCI quality team shall be final.
You can add brownie points to your scorecard as well - Sharing the contest poster and tagging 2 friends (On any social media platform) will win you 10 points. Writing a judgment summary gets you 20 and an article gets you 30.
You can drop a mail at firstname.lastname@example.org in case of any query regarding the contest.
if two reports had been registered in different police station with regard to an offence, and contradictory reports have been presented in the Court by respective investigating officer, what proceedings should be adopted by the magistrate.
Don't just waste your valuable time, if it's true and the court has taken cognizance on both the reports and issued criminal proceedings against the accused, then file revision before the concerned H.C. under section 482 Cr PC.
respected Vashisht sir it's a real problem came before judicial magistrate Allahabad, actually two reports had been registered in respect of the same offence in different police station and two different investigation report came from different police station in respect of the same offence, one of which the final report has been presented by investigating officer and the other investigating officer presented charge sheet,
Even if, with the new story that 'A' police station submitting FR, means that no evidence was found against the accused. So the accused was absolved by the 'A' police, then probably the court may have not taken cognizance of the alleged crime. But 'B' police submitting charge sheet meant that evidence was found against the same very accused. However the querist is silent whether both the reports were submitted to the same court or in two different courts. Whether the other court has taken cognizance or not on the charge sheet of 'B' police. So, Dr. Vashisht is correct, that it is hypothetical statement.
Vivek Chauhan may be half true, as, such foolish things are norm in my state U.P., but the empathy is that he is selective in query and not only that in such a foolish case maybe he himself not involved. So, my suggestion is to not to answer him any more instead carry on with helping others.