Sir/Madam, When the trial is over in judicial magistrate court, the judgement was pronounced and the acquittal order was pronounced. Now to get the certified copy of the judgement, complaint copy, fir, csr copy - the copy application was filed in court after two year from the date of pronouncement of judgement. The crpc provision was not mentioned in copy application and hence returned by judge. To compile and represent the same what is the provision in crpc to get copy application of above documents? (Where as in civil, order XX rule 20 or 151 cpc available, where as in criminal at high court 432 crpc avaiable, hence what is the provision of crpc in lower trial court) kindly reply. Thanks and regards
- In our salary components we have Basic, Personal Pay, HRA, Washing Allowance, Conveyance allowance and no DA - While calculating gratuity, do we have to take Basic and Personal Pay for calculation of gratuity or only Basic is enough - One of our employees is fighting for Basic + Personal Pay for calculating gratuity
Shall be grateful, if you could kindly clarify whether we should consider Basic and Personal Pay for calculation of Gratuity or only Basic to be considered Your urgent reply with relevant case laws is highly appreciated.
Cash App Customer Service is one of the most powerful troubleshooting mediums which would be active all the time in order to weed out all sorts of Yahoo-related issues and hurdles within a least time span. Just make a simple call at helpline number and get all your problems sorted out from the root, in no time. https://www.market-place.biz/cash-app-customer-service/
Hello everyone, I have been staying in India since August 2018, and have not been cohabiting with my wife since. My 14 year old daughter resides with me and my wife used to visit her sometimes but we never stayed together. I filed for contested divorce on Jan, 2019. After 5 dates and creating lot of nuisance she appeared in the case on 1st Oct, 2019. In the meantime she filed a false NCR on June, 2019 against me, which was closed after i submitted eveidence in local PS. I also obtained a restraining order against her through family court, so that she cannot enter my house in any pretext. Now on Nov, 19 she filed another false NCR on DV..Police refused to do FIR. She now filed a DV case under magistrate in Traffic Court. I have every evidence against her to prove that i never have cohabited with her on any context and i am the sole owner of my house. Moreover she stays with her parents in Kolkata and i stay in Bangalore. She cannot do maintenance as she used to work and is well qualified and i have every proof of all her earnings as well. My queries : 1. Can DV case be quashed and on what grounds 2. Can DV holds any base after she has appeared and contested in the divorce case. 3. Will i be instructed to leave my house 4.i have a injunction that she cannot enter my house under any pretext. Can the magistrate overrule the district judge's ruling? Kindly help
What are the cases that can be included in this category of law? There will be different sections to punish the culprits. Can anyone explain the possible punishments for every crime that the Indian Penal Code states? I'm researching in criminal law and would like to study the laws of different countries and compare it with of United States. Any help will be appreciated! Cheers!
Posted
by : NARASIMHAM SINGAMPALLIon 14 November 2019
My friends have an apartment in Kavali, A.P. The permission is for Stilts+4 floors. Stilt floor is marked as parking in the original plan approved by the municipality. The builder has kept 80 yards for himself but it is not clearly demarcated. Now, he has constructed a shop in the area shown as parking in the plan. Can he claim that it is in his own site? The shop is encroaching into the area under the building proper by about 3 or 4 feet. Can he get it approved under BUILDING REGULARISATION SCHEME?
When the original querist didn't work between 2014/2018, then where is the question of his salary for those years. He, better have petitioned for his appointment with salary/arrears to be effective from 2014 in his petition before the HC at the onset itself. However, India follows no work no pay principal. The Apex or HC Court's judgements may be very difficult to search on the internet as the OQ wishes.
Then you are hypocrite too, where you say that you are an atheist, but still believe in, that not only lord Brahma exist, but even he is the creater of the mankind. How ridiculous! However under section 340 Cr PC, two conditions apply, 1) Material produced before the court make out a prima facie case for a complaint for the purpose of inquiry into an offence referred to clause (b) (ii) of section 195 Cr PC and (ii) It is expedient in the interest of justice that an inquiry shall be made into the alleged offence. SC- Amarsangnath ji v. Hardik Harshadbhai Patel on 23-11-2016
on 14 November 2019
