Police refusing to investigate presence of imminent threat

If the local police refuse to act in a cognisable offence matter, the usual remedies are :

1. Complaint to SP/senior police officers under Section 154(3) CrPC/BNSS
2. Application before Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC seeking FIR/Investigation
3. Urgent mention/application in pending Article 226 writ for protection or early hearing.
4. Approach Human Rights Commission or Police complaints Authority in serious cases.

Keep all complaints and evidences properly documented. 

It appears that you have already approached high court with a petition seeking direction to concerned police in this regard and the same is pending, hence no opinion can be rendered to the subjudice matter except advise you to take steps to get the high court case listed at the earliest and get a direction to the concerned police in this regards.

Prima facie you are seeking a second opinion on the issue / fate of writ petition already pending before High Court, is it so ?

If so, seek opinion and advise of the  lawyer engaged by you or some other local prudent lawyer, who will have to peruse case file and advise you properly.

Dear Sir

You are correct ... Yes the under Article 226,  r/w s.482 was filed in 2023 , but Ho'ble judge dismissd it on lack of Court Fee which incorrect all Court fee Transaction were attached with the writ Petition filed . After Stamp Reporting acknowledge the Paymnet it was placed before Bench

Somebody altered changed or deleted Court Fee payments , objections filed Registrar did not took any investigation 

The technical defects are to be rectified properely especially when the court observes them while returning the petition.

Hence you may go through the papers properly, scrutinize them  and rectify the defects properly before representing the same , your advocate should have an answer to such issues, you may rely upon him on all such further issues. You cannot take any action as proposed when the matter is pending before high court.

Originally posted by : khurana
	Dear Sir You are correct ... Yes the under Article 226,  r/w s.482 was filed in 2023 , but Ho'ble judge dismissd it on lack of Court Fee which incorrect all Court fee Transaction were attached with the writ Petition filed . After Stamp Reporting acknowledge the Paymnet it was placed before Bench   Somebody altered changed or deleted Court Fee payments , objections filed Registrar did not took any investigation

Mr. Khurana,

There is fixed (nominal) court fees for a writ petition under Article 226 r/w Section 482 CrPC and registry shall not accept the petition where it is short of such court fees.

You are being misguided.

You have stated, inter alia, that, ".....After Stamp Reporting acknowledge the Paymnet it was placed before Bench"

it is an unbelievable statement, recheck.

Further you have mentioned, that, "Somebody altered changed or deleted Court Fee payments , objections filed Registrar did not took any investigation"

similarly it is also a false and wrong statement, recheck.

Prima facie you are being misguided.

It is better to seek opinion and advise of some other local prudent lawyer.

How could there be "Yes the under Article 226,  r/w s.482 was filed in 2023 , but Ho'ble judge dismissd it on lack of Court Fee"?

Hello Sir

I quoting a para from my Petition to let you all know  when the Court Fee was transferred TWICE not once to Principle Bench of High Court.  

The judicial proceedings with in Hon’ble High Court at Allahabad showed a dangerous trend of destroying judicial records within court custody consequently the non-filing of the Court Fee documents intended, only to delay the disposal of the Petition. It has further been pointed out that the disappearance of Court documents therefore caused serious prejudice to the case of the defense.

The non-filing of the Court Fee documents is clearly an abuse of the process of the Court, intended, not for agitation of any bona fide mistake by Party, but only to delay the disposal of the Petition. The matter has remained pending in the High Court for nearly Four  years during which period the proceedings in the Court stands stayed.

As per the contents of the Petition, the primary accused with others, has destroyed court documents filed with the, Principal Bench of High Court and also misrepresented those facts before this Hon’ble Division Bench to obtained favorable orders. The document bearing Court Fee Details with Receipt No. UPCT0305G2350M061, transferred dated 03.07.2023 was annexed in the Petition & on the website presented before this Court , UIN No. UPCT0305G2350M061 . The Court Fee of Rs 255 /- was affixed with the plaint before the payment was confirmed and approved by the Listing Section of High Court and by the Office of GA dated 00.00.2023. Court Fee to the amount  255/- had been paid in the first instance & the second Payment of Court Fee after the impugned order dated 13.09.2023, was re-submitted dated September 15th 2023, Court Fee Receipt No. UPCT1510i2350M753 , to the Principal Bench of Allahabad Court , to the Amount of Rs 250/-.

Both Court  Fee Payments were transferred Electronically thru Stockholding Company updated on Honble Allhabd High Court  Website so the records CANNOT BE DISPUTED not even by the Bench.

You can file a review petition by attaching the supporting documents pertaining to online payment before  the larger bench of the same high court.