Although all the impugned orders have been passed by the same First Appellate Authority and may involve common questions of law and fact, the legally safer and procedurally appropriate course is to file separate second appeals under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 against each of the 30 orders, as each order constitutes a distinct appellate decision and gives rise to a separate cause of action. Filing a single composite appeal against multiple independent orders may invite objections from the Registry or the State Information Commission, particularly where each order arises out of a separate RTI application or first appeal. However, after filing separate second appeals, the appellant may specifically request the State Information Commission to club all the appeals for hearing and dispose of them by a common order on the ground that they involve identical parties, common issues of law and fact, and substantially similar grounds of challenge. Such a course not only safeguards the maintainability of the appeals but also promotes judicial economy and avoids multiplicity of proceedings.