I asked a question on LCI. Here it is pasted below:
Why was dharmendra not held guilty under hindu marriage act of 1955 section 17 and ipc section 494 for bigamy?
More descripttion: Dharmendra was already married to Prakash Kaur and without taking divorce from her he married Hema Malini in 1980. The Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 makes bigamous marriages void and IPC 494 awards punishment upto seven years and fine. Also, Dharmendra said that he did not convert to Islam for marrying again. Therefore, under what exceptions and for which reasons was Dharmendra not held guilty for bigamy?
Lawyer named T. Kalaiselvan replied airily in a personal tone:
a hypothetical question, hence ignored. are you aggrieved by this act of Dharmendra?, if yes then you can file criminal complaint
Shailesh (Businessman) 15 September 2025 @T. Kalaiselvan Reply to only that extent which is asked to you. Aapse jitna poocha jaaye utna he jawaab dijiye. What you have asked that am I aggrieved with this act of Dharmendra is a personal matter of mine and it is none of your concern. Respect the privacy of the person who is asking you a question. Do not make airy allegations that the question is hypothetical. You mean to say that Dharmendra is a hypothetical person? I never thought that movies also can create imaginary people like comic books. HAHAHAHAHA!!! ROFL!!! :D
SO, PEOPLE CAN COMMENT ON THIS QUESTION.. AND MR. T. KALAI... WHATEVER (SOUTH INDIAN NAMES :P), CAN GIVE HIS VIEW THAT WHY DOES SHE TAKES INTEREST IN SOMEONE'S PERSONAL AND PRIVATE MATTERS WHICH ARE NOT HER CONCERNS.
