Bk 29 June 2022
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 30 June 2022
Let her counsel be consulted for the vague and confusing facts.
Anila Sabu 30 June 2022
The opposing party, who receives the legal notice after it has been served, has the opportunity to amicably resolve the conflict. For the recipient, it serves as a reminder of the legal notification of the actions that, whether purposefully or accidentally, caused a problem for the sender.
Due to the fact that two weeks have been awarded as an indulgence, this means that two additional weeks have been given in exchange for the payment of a debt or the completion of another responsibility.
Now all that you can do is wait for the two weeks to get over, if he/she still does not fulfill the required actions before this granted time period is over then you must notify the High Court who will then take further actions.
Bk 01 July 2022
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 01 July 2022
The facts posted in the query vis-a-vis response do not match since alleged sis of queriest is stated to have filed an appeal in HC with an application for condonation of delay for that HC issued notice to respondent which is stated to have been returned "Unserved".
Conversely the reply to the query is prima facie qua notice issued by a party to another for settlement of dues, which is just presumption and irrelevant to facts posted, is it so ??????
P. Venu (Advocate) 01 July 2022
to my understanding, the 'indulgence' granted is in the context of further steps in serving the Notice.
Bk 02 July 2022