there was cross examination where plaintiff advocate suggested as under " the open path of gat no 1407 was in possession of plaintiff?" and the reply was no by the defendant
but while noting down by the steno "hand written" it was noted as under
"it is wrong to dsay that open path of gat no 1408 is in possession of plaintiff"
now the main problem is gat no 1407 belongs to plaintiff and gat no 1408 belongs to defendant...now if we dont object to this error it will be admission from plaintiff that the open path is peice and parcel of gat no 1408 and which belongs to defendant....
please suggest remedy..!
under which provision of CPC such errors can be corrected the said error was noticed when certified copies of the cross examination were applied and recieved and since then two date had been passed..!!
PLS ADVICE URGENT..!!!