Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Mental harassment by husband

Page no : 2

(Guest)

Sorry about your state of mind.

 

Opinion: No need to be...even I don't need on your's .

You might be a victim  of false criminal case or may have witnessed it.

 

Opinion: Yes. Mam, I am a victim as well as a live telecast player as well as an audience of 498a game running since 1984 through out the nation. And also for DVA since 2005.

Major difference is that 498a is like Test match which goes for 5 years instead of 5 days and DVA 2005 is like 50 overs match but ends with 500 days.

 

If you read be earlier reply I have clearly mentioned I cannot go for placing false allegations.

 

Opinion: Oh no. So chweet of you, you have saved one AAtma from being crushed by Indian judiciary

 

I am taking advice to know what my rights are,

 

Opinion: Oh oh! so you are here to know your rights...Ok. right madam..!

But your lawyer has not told you about your Birth right of filling 498a and dva and maintenance cases. I know your lawyer had sincerely advised you to file such cases but you are a smart woman. Who don't need to file such cases but directly need a way to lead through the husband's frozen treasury.

 

not trying to find out ways to acquire something from others pocket.

 

Opinion: OMG !  really........ but your post was directly inflicted and asked the attention of all the experts to guide you to how to grab husbands and in-laws property. Don't you have asked such question in your thread, don't these properties comes under other's ?

Naaaaaaaa, don't say no, you would be easily caught by other's....my dear "Bad victim of marriage"

 

 Plesae do not comment when you don’t know what a person has gone thru or has done to survive a relationship. Thank you.

 

Opinion: What survive...!

If you would have in so much pain then you would never waited for such long years to get part with him.

It was not survival it was Vival and that also totally on your wish.

My utmost concern:

Are you working in bank or what?.

As you need 6 years of interest which you have deposited with fixed of marriage by the consent of love marriage scheme with your husband.;)

 

It's not a joke that you are treating your marriage as Right to get properties ones it fails.

 

One Tough task to you ))

 

Daily worship for IrBM namo ........

 

Wait until IrBM comes to India......Till then enjoy with other fixed deposits of relationship

---------------------------------

 

One request to you :

PLZ give 10 reasons satisfying to court as why Husband or in-laws should give their property to you?

Even when you are well educated, earning and maintaining the status. No child also , Having chance of remarriage also. Then on what condition you will create a new Law under HMA 1955 to get inherited as well as husband's self earned property or your in-laws property?

 

 

It will be beneficial for other womens who are eyeing on their husband's and in-laws property.......


Now, WE all members are waiting for your Answer))

 

ESIS

Pradeep (Eng.)     26 August 2014

Marriage is a sacred contract. Whoever violates it (wife or husband) by maintaining a relationship outside marriage  should be punishable by religion and law. religion should ostracize them and declare them as outcasts. Law should punish them through apprpriate jail term, community work and compensation paid to the victim of cheating.  Many laws in India needs amendment. Beaing cheated is a terrible experience. It should be a crime in marriage. Nowadays a cheater can get away with an easy divorce.
1 Like

bad marriage victim (working)     26 August 2014

Mr. ESIS .. I do not have any lawyer so far.. haven't even initiated my case as of yet so your statement "I know your lawyer had sincerely advised you to file such cases but you are a smart woman. Who don't need to file such cases but directly need a way to lead through the husband's frozen treasury" .again shows your state of mind and m again SORRY for that. I don't owe any explanatiion to you. Have already responded with my points.  your another statemen " If you would have in so much pain then you would never waited for such long years to get part with him.It was not survival it was Vival and that also totally on your wish." shows your thinking again. we don't get married for divorce. I fought to be in this relation till the time I could, but before one of us kill each other or harm ourself its better to end it.

"Opinion: Oh no. So chweet of you, you have saved one AAtma from being crushed by Indian judiciary
Yes I have saved one aatma by not joining the league. 

"It's not a joke that you are treating your marriage as Right to get properties ones it fails."

I am not treating my marriage as a right to get properties.. I am trying to know if my divorce has any right to get financial security for my future. 

Anyways I  had a few questions before I go for divorce, which a few mannered and gentle people have responded nicely with all the pros and cons. but the way you communicate indicates that you don't deserve to be communicated. I will definately give more than 10 valid points to court when needed. I am here to take opinions. I'm taking some good advices from here and getting to know some sick mentality in the society.  Any more response from you is not at all Welcome. you can still post, as it looks you have enough hatred towards women and have enough time for all theses things.  :) 

stanley (Freedom)     26 August 2014

@ Author .

We come into this world naked and we go out of this world naked . 

 

1. Since you are a working women and in your 30 's you are managing with your day to day life within your source of income  . As experience catches on you are bound to grow both in designation and salary  . So gradually you would be in a position to buy a place  of your own and it would be your hard earned money . Its just a matter of time .

 

2. Put aside your greed for properties or what you term as a security you wish for . Its human instinct and a devils wish that brings greed into us .Even if a law was passed that you could acquire your husbands property , do you think that you would be happy in life rather than owning a property through your hard earned money .

 

 3. As of date you state that you dont want to marry as its the frustation , anger that has built up within you . you have to let go of this anger that has built up within you to keep your peace of mind and lead a better life . 

 

 

 

2 Like

Happily Divorced (TL)     26 August 2014

Adultery in a love marriage is not making much sense to me. But as the author posted both of them were staying away from each other. In such a case, a husband finding partner outside the marriage is understandable and cannot be called a crime.

 

@Author

Get divorce and move on. You wont get any properties unless you file any false cases and neither you should get because you enjoy a better status and u r a self sufficient woman. Free yourself and keep you sanctity. Properties are self earned, it cannot/must not be grabed. Even as a legal right. a needy woman should get alimony but your case doesnt look to be a fit case.

 

Dont accuse anyone of sick mentality without knowing the legalities, facts and circumstances that these men are going thru, it will only show you in bad light.

2 Like

(Guest)

Still she has not given the reasons why she is able bodied to get properties of her in-laws and husband?


This Woman author thinks that we are blind, we can't see her quest of seeking properties.


She has gone into other state of mind in the lust of grabbing properties.


She is so overconfidence about her womanhood and her women friendly law that she is alleging other to be sick mentality.


I feel pity on this woman who is living in the third world.


Where some roadside cheap lawyers would have suggested her that you will get properties of husbands and also in-laws, just try it.


But she don't know that Kuch Bhi Karle.......But isse Milega sirf Babaji Ka thullu


---------------------------------

Apart from the category of above women group,

There are so many women in India who are uneducated, unable, in destitute condition where they can't earn a minimum few hundred rupees to have two times food for herself and for her minor childrens.


The conditions of these women whose husband's have left them in the destitute really needs such kind of financial help.


But what about these category of women ,,,who is so much rude n shrewd that she doesn't carry any shame also of asking in-laws and husband's property even though she is only  well only  30 , well educated, good earning, no child and every chances of rising better in future whether for her career or for remarriage.


This woman is carrying a selfish pride after seeing her other groups of metro women who have harassed her husband on the account of grabbing his properties.


She is alleging that she married for financial gain .......



PS: This woman doesn't need any sympathy from the society but needs a bowl in hand and to make her sit before court to collect her illegal property from her husband and in-laws.


Ja Jille apni Zindagi..........,


Indian Slow motion court is waiting for you..!:)

 

 


Pradeep (Eng.)     26 August 2014

Hindu Women As Life Partner

Hinduism regards man and woman as the two halves of the eternal Being, each constituting a vibrant, existential part, quite incomplete in itself. In the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, Prajapati, the primordial God, divides himself into two-man and woman, the symbols of cosmic polarity deriving sustenance from the same source.1 In the cosmic scheme man represents Purusha (the Person, Spirit) and woman Prakriti (Nature, Primal Matter), both of whom unite to keep the world going. So goes the Vedic verse: ‘I am He, you are She; I am song, you are verse; I am heaven, you are earth. We two shall here together dwell becoming parents of children.’2

The Matrimonial Ideal
Marriage is the coalescence of complementary opposites for pleasure, progeny and self-fulfillment. The cosmic model of the marriage of Surya, the daughter of the Sun, with the Asvina twins (who defeated the prime suitor, Soma, in a racing contest) determines the praxis of the Hindu concept in this respect.3 Being equal halves of one essence, husband and wife are parents in joy and sorrow and in the fulfillment of the fourfold aim of life-dharma (ethical perfection), artha (material advancement), kama (pleasure) and moksha (liberation). Neither is superior to the other as each has different natural functions to perform and social obligation to fulfill. Hinduism expects the partners to shed their individual identities to become one at the physical, mental and psychical levels before transmuting the material relationship into a spiritual one. Says the Rig Veda in the context of ‘Surya Vivaha’: Bless now this bride, O bounteous Lord, cheering her heart with the gift of brave sons. Grant her ten sons; her husband make the eleventh’ (10.85.45).

Nowhere do the Vedas say that woman is man’s property, as she came to be considered in certain periods of history. Nor it is enjoined that her role shall be subordinated to that of her husband. This is evident from the sukta of Surya’s bridal in the Rig Veda: Enter your house as the household’s mistress. May authority in speech ever be yours!’ 10.85.26).’Watch over this house as mistress of the home. Unite yourself wholly with your husband’ (10.85.27). ‘Here dwell ye, be not parted; enjoy full age, play and rejoice with sons and grandsons in your own house’ (10.85.42). ‘Act like a queen over your husband’s father, over your husband’s mother likewise, and his sister. Over all your husband’s brothers be queen’ (10.85.46).

In the Hindu rite of marriage, when the bridegroom holds the hand of the bride, he in a way promises his companionship on equal terms. When he asks her to tread on the stone, he wants her to be strong like it and not show weakness of any kind in any situation. ‘Resist the enemies; overcome those who attack you.’4 Subsequent rites of marriage like the oblation of parched grain, circumambulation of fire and the tacking of seven steps by the bride are equally dignifying for the girl. After the seventh step is taken the bridegroom tells her that they have come closer to each other. ‘With seven steps we become friends. Let me not be severed from your friendship. Let not your friendship be severed from me’.5 Obviously  ‘friendship implies equality, not submission.’ Before the departure of the bride from her parental home, the bridegroom touches her heart and reiterates the same feelings, adding that the Lord God has brought them together: ‘I hold your heart in serving fellowship. …You are joined to me by the Lord of all creatures.’ After reaching her husband’s home, the bridegroom makes her look at the polar star after sunset and exhorts her to ‘be firm with me’ ‘bear children’ and stay together ‘a hundred years’ (1.8.19).

All this shows in an ideal Hindu marriage the girl is not a commodity but a respectable human being. Although monogamy is preferred and divorce discouraged, as the couple is believed to be united for ever in this and the next world, the smrtikaras and other like Kautilya allow the dissolution of some forms of marriage such as the brahma, daiva, arsa and prajapati with the consent of both parties in certain circumstances.

An Equal Half        
The Hindu woman as life partner has a fourfold character: she is ardhangini, one half of the her husband, metaphorically speaking; sahadharmini, an associate in the fulfillment of human and divine goals; sahakarmini, a part to all her husband’s action and sahayogini, a veritable cooperator in all his ventures. Husband and wife together are called dampati, joint owners of the household, sharing work in terms of their biological, psychological and individual dharma. The former provides the seed (bija) and the latter the field ( ksetra) for its fructification, so that humans could be perpetuate in the cosmic process of evolution. Both have the joint responsibility of helping their children grow in all respects, but the contribution of the wife is always immense.

As life partner the Hindu woman has equal right to participate in religious right to participate in religious rites and ceremonies; in fact, certain sacrifices like the Sita harvest sacrifice, the Rudrayaga for suitable sons-in-law or the Rudrabali sacrifice for material prosperity are performed by women alone. Hindu lawgivers like Gobhila and Asvalayana ordain that no ritual or sacrifice can be complete (sampurna) without the presence of the wife. Even Rama had to order for Sita’s statue in gold to make up for her absence during this asvamedha sacrifice. In the Ramayana, Rama’s mother Kausalya offers oblations to the fire god Agni and Tara performs the Svastyayana ritual for the success of her husband Vali against Sugriva. Women of those days were quite learned in the Vedic lore. Draupadi was a brahmavadini and Tara an adept at reciting mystic syllables. Oghavati, Arundhati and Sulabha possessed a thorough knowledge of the Vedas and imparted religious knowledge even to rishis. The spiritual attainments of Savitri and Anusuya have become legendary. In the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad one meets women of wisdom such as Maitreyi and Gargi. The former abandoned wealth for wisdom and the latter entered into a debate with sage Yajnavalkya at the court of King Janaka. Much later, Bharati, the wife of Mandana Misra, carried forward the tradition by acting as judge in the philosophic debate between her husband and Shankaracharya. When she found her husband losing the debate, she emphatically told Shankaracharya that his victory would be complete only if he could defeat her, since she constituted her husband’s better half.

The Vedas give a married woman the right to talk and debate independently. The wife is the home (jayedastam), says the Rig Veda.7 Besides, she is treasure house of happiness,8 a point elaborated by Manu in a much more explicit way: ‘Women must be honored and adorned by their fathers, brothers, husbands and brothers-in-law who desire (their own) welfare.’9 Where women are honoured, there the gods are pleased; but where they are not honoured, no sacred rites yield rewards, (3.56). ‘Offspring, (due performance of) religious rites, faithful service, the highest conjugal happiness and heavenly bliss for the ancestors and oneself depend on one’s wife alone’ (9.28).

Manu declares that the perfect man is one who constitutes a trinity made up of his wife, himself and their offspring (9.95), The wife being a gift from the Gods (9.95),she ought to be supported to the end of her life. If Manu points out of seductive nature of women (2.213-4), he is equally unsure of the unbridled passion of men. He advises that wise men must not be in the company of even their own mothers, sisters or daughters in a lonely place, for they may deviate from the right path (2.215)! Manu regards woman as a precious unit of the family and of society but denies them absolute freedom due to their physical vulnerability. He, however, distinguishes between the noble and virtuous and the degenerate women, and like other smrtikaras, criticizes those who are faithless, fickle, sensuous, immodest, quarrelsome and loose. ‘Day and night women must be kept in dependence upon males and if the attached themselves to sensual enjoyments they must be kept under one’s control’ (9.2). Manu prescribes capital punishment for killers of women, exempts pregnant and old women from paying fines and suggests that as mater of courtesy, they should be given precedence when crossing the road.

Such is the protection given to the Hindu wife in the Dharmashastras that she cannot be abandoned by her husband even if she in dulges in s*xual congress outside marriage or is raped. Both Devala and Yajanavalkya opine that a raped woman cannot be divorced as she becomes pure after menstruation. The latter adds that the wife can be abandoned if she conceives a baby from another person, kills a brahmin or insinuates against her husband; if she is a habitual drinker, suffers from prolonged illness, is cunning, treacherous, sterile, exceptionally extravagant, or uncouth. But even in these cases she should be fed and clad well and properly looked after.10 An abandoned woman without an issue or a male protector becomes a social responsibility, says Manu.11 If anyone grabs her property during her lifetime, that person deserves to be punished like a thief (8.29.352).
 
When Kalidasa wrote that women go the way of their husband as moonlight follows the moon or lightning the cloud,12 he meant thereby that they were not different from each other. The Hindu scripttures lay emphasis on harmony between husband and wife that is so essential for family peace and prosperity. Harmony requires understanding, which can only be among equals. In the Rig Veda, the couple jointly pray: ‘ May all Devas and Apas unite our hearts. May Matarisva, dhata, Destri all bind us close.’13 The highest duty of man and wife says Manu, is to be faithful to each other. While the supreme duty of the husband is to safeguard his wife, to care for her needs and necessities, and to keep her happy with gift and presents, the wife is expected to be pious and chaste, sincere and faithful to her partner, gentle, suave, skilled and sweet- tongued.

The Pativratya Ideal
The observance of the pativratya dharma by women is not tantamount to servility and subordination. Marital fidelity is greatly valued in the Hindu tradition as it leads to family harmony and bestows occult powers. A woman who sees the Lord in her husband and makes him her very life cannot deviate from the path of virtue; and virtue is power itself. There are many examples of Hindu women who as life partners made great sacrifices, underwent trials and tribulations, and some times showed their thaumaturgic powers born of chastity (satitva). Gandhari covered her eyes with a strip of cloth as her husband Dhritarashtra, the king of Hastinapura, was blind. Madri, one of Pandu’s wives, burnt herself on the funeral pyre of her husband, a practice which remained current in some Indian communities and regions down to the British period, when it was banned in 1829. Sita accompanied Rama to the forest during the days of his exile, kept her chastity intact while in the custody of Ravana, the king of Lanka, and went through the agni pariksa so that her husband could fulfil his raja dharma. Savitri confronted Yama, the god of death, and saved the life of her husband. Sati Anusaya turned the Hindu trinity of gods into children. Littérateurs like Kalidasa and Tulsidas became men of learning because of their wives. During the Muslim invasions, many women committed jauhar (the custom of entering a bonfire when the defeat of their menfolk was certain) in order to preserve their chastity. The resistance put up by Rani Lakshmi Bai of Jhansi (widow of Gangadhar Rao) and the Rani of Ramgarh (widow of Raja Lachman Singh) against the British during the rising of 1857 has few parallels in history. Countless Hindu women participated along with their husbands in India’s struggle for independence.

Although the concept of pati-paramesvara (regarding one’s husband as god) has suffered an erosion in the wake of women’s empowerment, respect for the husband continues, as is evident from the observance by Hindu women of such traditional vows as Vata Savitri, Haritalika and Karka Chaturthi - all aimed at a long and happy conjugal life.

Nowhere do the accredited Hindu scripttures ordain that women should be abused, disgraced, chastised without reason or divorced in ordinary circumstances. Yet expectation from women as life partners have been many and varied. The best female partner, according to a popular Sanskrit adage, is one who renders advice like a minister, obeys like a maidservant, feeds like a mother, pleases like the nymph Rambha, acts as a veritable companion, and has the forbearance of Mother Earth.
1 Like

malipeddi jaggarao (retired banker)     26 August 2014

Go by the advice of experts Mr.Kalaiselvan and Tajoobsindia.

Pick-up positive points.  Everybody will not give the advice of your liking.

It is a love marriage.  Did you not know his habits at that time.  I hope it is not love at first sight.

Your in-laws are co-operative.  They are advising you to take divorce as their son is not worth enough to be your husband.  They have not taken dowry.  But you are eying on their properties. 

Make some introspection and come to a logical conclusion.  

2 Like

All is NOT well (Harrased by Biased Laws)     27 August 2014

Very well Said by Every Sufferer is a Saviour... !!! I Second your Thoughts. 

 

Mu Urge to all Experts and Members,

The Ladies should not be entitled for any response in this forum who seeks the advice on grabbing money / money from the husbands or seeking the way to rope in the husband or his family in the fake cases (like have been seen in many other threads in this forum)

1 Like

Surinder Singh (Centre Head)     28 August 2014

Very well Said by Every Sufferer is a Saviour........ I am also facing a false litigation filled by my wife. This law is totaly rubbish. We are victim of such old law.

 Vedas say that woman is man’s property, But now a days this bl**dy law says Man is women's property. Hat's off to Every sufferer is a Saviour......

Pradeep (Eng.)     28 August 2014

Where in the Vedas is said that woman is man's property? Vedic texts say that women should not live in absolute freedom, which means not to live separately from the society. Men are allowed by vedas absolute freedom to leave their societal life and live as sanyasis or wander away their life as they wish.

Vedas say women should always live with a responsible male. When young it is the father. If father is no more Uncles or elder brothers should care for the women. When married the husband is responsible for the welfare and she should live with the husband. In old age she has to live with her sons because her husband is allowed to leave and accept sanyasam after his grihastashram is over.

Women are given equal rights by the vedas. And men are given the responsibilty of taking good care of them. A man is not supposed to desert a woman whom he married. If you look at what vedas instructed, this poster's husband had done outrageous sins, by deserting his wife.
1 Like

Shantanu Wavhal (Worker)     28 August 2014

get MCD = simple & fast

or

file divorce on the ground of cruelty and prove the same = time + money consuming


wife has no right on in laws' property.

wife can live in shared household.

wife can get interium maintenance u/s 24 of HMA and permanent alimony u/s 25 of HMA

at the time of divorce, wife should get all her belongings (stri dhan)

 

24        Maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings

Where in any proceedings under this Act it appears to the court that either the wife or the husband, as the case may be, has no independent income, sufficient for her or his support and the necessary expenses of the proceeding, it may, on the application of the wife or the husband,  order the respondent to pay to the petitioner the expenses of the proceedings, and monthly during the proceedings such sum as, having regard to the petitioner’s own income and the respondent, it may seem to the court to be reasonable.

COMMENTS

The expression “husband and  wife” as finds place under s.24 does not require a rigid interpretation. Besides the inclusion of legally married wife and husband, the expression also includes the person claiming to be a wife or husband.-  Laxhmibai v Ayodhya Prasad AIR 1991 MP 47

In the case for one reason or the other the proceedings are protracted and the applicant is not the least responsible for, the applicant cannot lose the right for getting maintenance pendente lite from the date of application.- Indira Gangole v. S.K. Gangole AIR 1992 MP 73

In  case there is an order  of maintenance pendente lite passed, it cannot be appealed against for it is just an order interlocutory and never a judgement.- S.H.Gupta.v.P.S.Gupta.AIR 1991 Bom.423.

Where there is no obstacle in the matter of earning granting of maintenance to one who is skilled does not fall within the purview of the scheme of the Act. Simple fact of business  closed down, does not indicate no source of income .-Kanchan v. Kamalendra AIR 1992 BOM 493

Expenditure done on the travelling so as to attend the court where is a big distance from the  residence and the court is also included in the court of litigation, and in case some assistance is required by the applicant lady or  some male companion, it is necessary that the respondent must pay travelling expenses of both of them besides same deamess allowance.-S .D. Naik v. D.K. Naik 1993 (1)DMC 112

25        Permanent alimony and maintenance

(1)        any court exercising jurisdiction under this Act may at the time of passing any decree or at any time subsequent thereto, on application made to it for the purpose by either the wife or the husband, as the case may be, order that the respodent shall 1[***] pay to the applicant for her or his maintenance  and support such gross sum or such monthly or periodical sum for a term not exceeding the life of the applicant as, having regard to the respondent's own income and other property, if any, the income and other property of the applicant 2[the conduct of the  parties and other circumstances of the case], it may seem to the court to be just, and any such payment may be secured, if necessary, by a  charge on the immovable  property of the respondent.

(2)        If the court is satisfied that there is a change in the circumstances of either party a           at any time after it has made an order under sub-section (1), it may at the instance of either party, vary, modify or rescind any such order in such manner as the court may deem just.

(3)        If the court is satisfied that the party in whose favour an order has been made under this section has remarried or, if such party is the wife, that she has not remained chaste, or, if such party is the husband, that he has had

s*xual intercourse with any woman outside wedlock, 1[it may at the instance of the other party very modify or resind any such any order  in such manner as the court may the just.]

COMMENTS

Were matrimonial relief is refused the order of refusal amounts to a decree for all purposes including for appeal as under s.20 of the  Act.-M.K.Jain. v.L.M.Jain AIR 1991 Bom 440.

Sec. 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure or the principles of res judicata or the doctrine of estoppel is of no avail against the wife so as to defeat her claim for  the higher ratio  of maintenance allowance.- R.S.Rastogi.v.Vinay Rastogi AIR 1991 All. 255.

malipeddi jaggarao (retired banker)     29 August 2014

Dear Author:

The following are the excerpts taken from your own postings in the thread at different times.

Please have introspection of each and every sentence.

I will come to you after one or two days at your request to analyse your problem if you so wish.----

My husband turned alcoholic, psychic, started beating me, asking me for money..

 

 however in 2012 u got to know that my husband is cheating on me and I have enough proofs to prove it. When he was caught, he left me to live on my own.

when I complained he starting saying that I should leave job and come back to his home town and have baby.

 But by then he had lost my trust and denied to have a baby but continued a distant relationship. 

He continued extra marital with the other women.

 I still not thought of divorce, thinking he might understand the value of our marriage in my absence. But he is still the same abusive, aggressive and physic. 

 I have lost faith and trust getting in to depression again

 I want to come out of it and divorce seems the only option to me. But I am worried about my future. I am 30 and has no financial security.

My husband has nothing of his own as he keep changing his jobs and is always short of money because of his high expenditures.

But my in laws have got enough property. I can claim for my share to compensate for the years I have wasted in this marriage and my future security.

I’m earning to support my living. 

It can be proved that he has higher status than me. They have got properties in multiple cities. 

I am his wife and he is not being capable enough to keep this relationship healthy.

He betrayed, he cheated, still abuses me, and I have been trying to adjust so far but no more. 

So why am I penalized for this when I am not at fault.

what about the time and years I have wasted for this relation.. 

 he has still got his parents to look after and support and leave enough for his life ahead..

Is their a law that girl can not ask from ancestral property?

And Baby is not at all the reason.. 

initially my husband was not ready for it and from last 3 years I have trust issues with him and now I’m not ready. 

 He wants to have a baby now only to bind me to himself. So that I could never leave him because of Baby’s future and he can continue his life style the way it is.  

 have already been suggested to log criminal case against them but its against my norms hence not thinking of opting for this. 

 I have mentioned about his extra marital affair. that relation did not last more than 2 years because of his psychic behaviour.

 but i was not told that he will hit me, i was not told that he will ask for money, I was not told that he will cheat on me, I was not told that he will abuse me and my parents, I was not told that i will have to be the man of the house and run it.

 

you suggesting to let him go simply as if nothing has happened, so that he can remarry and spoil another girls life..

 

My life is spoiled but letting it go the way you are suggesting, will encourage him to spoil some other girl's life.

---

1 Like

malipeddi jaggarao (retired banker)     30 August 2014

I am waiting for your response.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register