Gentlemen,
Please guide me with this query.
M/s ABC is online retail company operating at Noida. both Directors of M/s ABC resides at Tilak Nagar, West District Delhi (Different Police station jurisdiction)
Mr. B is a consumer who buys stuff making online payment from Punjabi Bagh, West District Delhi ( Different police station jurisdiction)
M/s ABC does not deliver the product nor refund the money. Thus Mr. B sends legal notice to return the money to M/s ABC at operating company at Noida and also to their owners residing at Tilak Nagar, West District Delhi .
Nothing happens. Mr. B files complaint under section 420/406/417/418 against the directors of M/s ABC at P.S. Tilak Nagar, West District to return the money and also under section 156(3) of Crpc to Magistrate
Police / Magistrate objects on jurisdiction that even accused are residing at Tilak Nagar , West District but the appropriate jurisdiction should be Noida where they operate.
Kindly guide me on this. Also I see section 181 CrPC incase of 406 IPC cannot be ignored which says that
"
(4) Any offence of criminal misappropriation or of criminal breach of trust may he inquired into or tried by a court within whose local jurisdiction the offence was committed or any part of the property which is the subject of the offence was received or retained, or was required to be returned or accounted for, by the accused person. "
Any judgement which says case can be filed where Accused are residing even though no offence might not have been made out there ??????