It is written in some judgements that Judiciary has stake in 'Sustenance of Inst. of Marriage'.
Where in the law it is written so?
I am reading on 'no-fault divorce in western countries.
The judiciary there does not attempt to reconcile because there is no point in it after having such a law.
No-fault divorce doesn't leave any choice to other party to oppose whether innocent or not , whether wants to save marriage or not, irrespective of years of marriage/no of kids/dependents/irrespective of the problems which may not be eality solved such as time lost and something which can't be compensaed by money as also such as stigma/esteem/age/uncertainty etc.
No-fault divorce inclusion was treated as making all govt permanent jobs...as temporary job...to all whether they have served for 20-25 years already or not...and anybody would be dismissed from job at any time!!