It is necessary to serve documents while withdrawing a suit on fresh evidence

You can withdraw the suit under order 23 rule 1 cpc with liberty to file fresh suit on same cause of action.on changed/altered pleadings and fresh evidence.

At the time of withdrawn of suit you need not to submit any evidence or proof, submit all evidence or proofs with fresh suit.

Any meaningfu suggestion requires that the documents be perused and issues discussed.

It is mandatory that Section 80 Notice be served, when the suit is filed against public authorities.

You can withdraw a suit and file it again with fresh evidence and a revised cause of action, but you must obtain permission from the court to do so. Under Order 23 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, the plaintiff has the option to withdraw the suit, but if they want to file a fresh suit on the same matter, they need the court's leave. The court may grant this permission if the suit is likely to fail due to a formal defect or if there are other sufficient grounds, such as the need for new evidence or a clearer cause of action. 

Thank you all for reply.. this part of opinion on question please .

Questions: 1>  is it necessary the fresh evidence found should be served on the defendants while filing for withdrawal of suit . I don't want to share with them as it weaken my case.

2> On fresh evidence, can suit be filed on new cause of action. 

Originally posted by : ash83
	Thank you all for reply.. this part of opinion on question please . Questions: 1>  is it necessary the fresh evidence found should be served on the defendants while filing for withdrawal of suit . I don't want to share with them as it weaken my case. 2> On fresh evidence, can suit be filed on new cause of action.

No evidence or part of evidence is required to be served / filed with any suit. 

For withdrawal of suit, need not file any evidence as the suit comes to an end.

However, the averments made  in the plaint are required to be proved during plaintiff's evidence.

Either you are not clear as to what do you want to ask or it is an academic and time pass exercise.

As per your query your suit is at the stage of issues already being framed , if you have discovered new findings or evidence during the proceeding you can amend your suit only if that didn't change the basic nature of your plaint but if that's affecting the basic nature then you have to withdraw your suit and file fresh suit , sec 80 as you are saying is for making govenment a party but if your suit was accepted by the honorable court then that means the court has granted relaxation from not serving the notice seeing the urgency of the matter Also you don't need to inform anything to the defendant in any case.

Also since the matter is at issue stage if there is no objection in commission report or map then only the court will put your matter in evidence

It is advisable to seek professional services of a local prudent lawyer with relevant record for proper appreciation of facts / documents and necessary guidance.

https://www.assignmentmaster.co.nz/law-assignment-help

ofcourse you must meet the local practising lawyer with relevant papers to seek the best feasible advice.

At one stage you want to withdraw the suit, whereas in another breath you want to file fresh evidence, then you are stating about compulsory service of notice u/s 80(C) CPC to public authority.............

Prima facie it is a hypothetical and time pass bundle of queries, however, if it is a true story it is advisable to seek professional services of a local prudent lawyer with relevant records for proper appreciation of facts / documents and necessary guidance.