Irbm bill (passed in RS) is utterly anti hindu!!!
The amendment bill is completely anti-social.
The amendment bill is bringing islamic norms into hindu personal laws.
7 steps ritual in hindu marriage ceremony seems to have shown a dust bin by these Italian agents ruling our nation.
It is an attempt to bring islamic norms in hindu social structure (like three years of hindu iddat period and divorce without any fault of opposite spouse in the name irretrievable breakdown).
This is a consumerist stand!!
ariage is reduced as an enjoyment and enjoy and conveniently f--k off!!
In other religions unline hinduism ........ marriage is not treated as a sacrament
This is completely anti hindu. Hindu religion aspires for marital tie with same marital partner for 7 consecutive births and and it is not a contract which is terminable (alimony is like reprieve to victim and can't substitute for the loss actually)
why would people do the ritual of 7 steps then? (it is a mandatory ritual even by hindu marriage act for a valid marriage!!!)
(Sarcastically) Its better to remove the "definition" of a Hindu marriage from the HMA then!!!
Why to have bl**dy foolish redundent rituals of 7 steps and waste of money!!!!
why would future marriages take place in the first place after passing of this bill? live-in would become a norm!!!
why would anyone take a job which is going to be "temporary for life" and terminable one sidedly?
Is/Was IrBM was burning issue before our society ?
Are other issues vanished/over ?
Why parliamentarians devoting time on this bill with such priority?
Is it anybody's personal aspirations which is making entire nation's social structure into jeopardy?
This bill makes a mockery of Hindu religion and is anti religious and make a sheer mockery of hindu values, customs and religious sanskars.
This law would entirely change social structure and also change dowry structure (and negotiations as well!! in future due to likelihood of claim on ancestral properties as well!! ) that might happen in future!!!
Also it is made retrospective which is utterly worst thing that is going to become a law!!!! (please read s.3 of amendment RS bill about s.13C in HMA. It says "whether solemnised after or before the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment ) law 2013" )
It is like an employee being told after 20 years of service that his employment is not a permanent job but it was a temporary job and he/she may ahve to find another job anytime!!. .... and he/she can be terminated any time without any cause reason and any of his/her fault!!
the word "before" should be removed from S.13C!!! (make it prospective and NOT retrospective especially S.13C addition)
Let the new couples decide whether they want to enter into marriage knowingly or not !!!
At least both spouses would be aware at the outset that it is not necessarily a 'life time rishta' and it is very much terminable one-sidedly as well!!!
This bill is like introducing a new duckworth luis rule/method amendment just before the end of a cricket match!!! ....... and suddenly batting side is told to make 200 runs (as a recalculated target) in remaining last 10 balls in the match.
At least the future marriages it would be an informed decisions to tie a marital knot.
There is a divorce case going on in pune currently.
Divorce suit filed by wife (more than a decade of hindu marriage and also kids out of marriage)
husband got handicapped in road accident and hence wife got fed up and simply eloped instead of standing alongside her husband, and she deserted him alongwith kids
husband pleaded/defending in court that "he has been a dedicated husband thoughout and also more than 2/3rd two third of his earning are in wife's name" and she eloped with all the property and also and deserted him when husband was handicapped and especially when husband was in need of help and support.
and on top of it, wife alleged 'cruelty by husband' to seek divorce.
now that husband is literally on streets like a psychiatric case.
'no fault divorce' would change our social structure and break social institution of marriage.
Other false propaganda being made by ruling congress
this amendment bill is not women friendly in reality.
also this amendment bill is not a divorce friendly as well!!
how?? case delaying tactic has nothing to do with legal provisions!!
still it may take years for any case to conclude.
even clear cut cases with clinching evidence take years in court.
also it takes the course of appeals as well.
that also consumes a lot of time.
and also there many other ways to delay the decision
Wake up people!!!!