Update on this case.
Honorable Session Court has setaside order of JMFC where JMFC returned complaint filed u/s 156(3) on a basis that complainant should approach to the Court (i.e. in this case Session Court) where crime actually took place. Session Court expressed opinion in its Order that JMFC is empowerd to accpet complaint u/s. 156(3) and hence complaint can not be returned.
Now, I have below two questions:
1. Does JMFC is bound to call Respondents before ordering a registration of FIR in this matter? Note that JMFC didn't issued summons to Respondents when complaint was actually filed to JMFC first time about an year ago however Session Court has called all Respondents by summonsing them after which Respodents have contested case into Session Court.
2. I want to add another Respondent to original complaint which was returned by JMFC as explained above as during tenure of last 8-10 months I succeeded in gathering material which is raising suspect of involvment of this person into said crime.