Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Roshni B.. (For justice and dignity)     20 October 2011

India lags behind the west in matrimonial property rights

 

MUMBAI:


When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.

Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.

In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.

There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.

SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of "separation of property." Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.

A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.

In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.

Box

Wives, down the ages---in law

In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.

1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.

1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.

Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.

But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.

Box

Wives, down the ages---in law

In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.

1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.

1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.

Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.

But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.


https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/India-lags-behind-the-West-in-matrimonial-property-rights/articleshow/10421989.cms



Learning

 4 Replies

gaury..fight to win (Education)     20 October 2011

Thanks.If property is acquired after marriage then wife should get share in it depending upon situations how it was acquired.


(Guest)

I agree with Gaury, if wife has contributed financially or  by other means in husband's property then she should get share in that property.Property bought after marriage is sometmes result of many sacrifies of wife..like she takes responsibilty of the whole family kids and let husbands free to concentrate on money earning , she should get it's reward if situation of separation arises.


(Guest)

few days stay to few years relation, wife will get the share of husband's property +maintainance etc etc etc... also she will get share of her father's property. Double benefit..... without investing a penny or time or efforts/energy or office leave or loan liabilities or license/regestrition hassles, etc etc etc........

                                                                                         Good business.(or robbery).

1 Like

(Guest)

USA and Australia inhabited by genocide and killing of locals who have their own rich culture and customes. white outsiders imposed their own laws on their land for themselves. Few people in our country are also trying this on our people. 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register