It is really good to see this thread full of energy. The sad part is that people are not opening up here itself.
I am really with you anywhere, anytime.
We are no better than misuser because we prefer to keep our mouth shut rather than raising the voice "Wron is wrong".
See certain irony which I have seen,
a) Police prefer sending people to jail rather doing their duty. inorder to escape from cluthes of law, They feel their service is more important than the lives of people. They can file charges even w/o evidence (very safe and very less work). They can present loin as a cat in their report. While sitting in the office They write that have they searched for the accused in LONDON, (If you have objection on this line prove it otherwise in court, even if you did nothing will happen to them)
b) Advocate prefer exrorting money by misguiding the vicitims to keep their shop running. They are so heartless and cold blooded that it doesn't even matter to them, if certain people are going to jail because of their reluctancy and inability. Each and every lawyer feels that they are the most intelligent people on earth (blunder). They criticize their own fellows, judges criticize lawyer, lawyer criticize judges. They feel only dignified and most talented people are in this profession. They are good for nothing. I felt in my own case that I took better decision with my little knowladge of law rather than talking to two different counselors because It will be most obvious that one counsel will condemn others view. Doctors refer critical cases to more sr. doctor but lawyers will never do that because they all are equally intelligent. They will bombard you with knowledge and skills in chamber but in court they even fear to speak truth.
c) Judges - They are so much bound by law that they prefer templatized judgements. I have spoken to so many judges at all the level, they have a common view point, "It is safer to punish or linger rather acquiting people (even if they are innocent)". They have virtual dictionary that tells what to do when (facts of the case and evidence does n't matter)
d) Law makers - They can make any thing. they prefer patches in place of clear, equal, unbaised law (They cant make unbaised, equal, clear law.. think why??)
I felt that Jutice system works inline with the following quote,
"Keep engaging, sooner parties will run out of energy, no one will demand justice again, matter will get closed itself"
Author: Now tell me how should I fight. Whatever you have written I have tried all. The biggest irony is this that my defence will be heard only before conviction, No matter what you have, How innocent you are, first take the taste of laws. "This is the simple law of land"
My teacher use tell me one thing while teaching math, "There are two types of rules, one that you apply to solve the problem other is traditional unwritten rule which you have to follow while solving the problem. You can adopt different rules for first part but latter can not be over ruled. Traditions become law over a period of time, those can not be overruled" (If not clear, read it many times)
[Please take criticism in right spirit, These are my personal opinions, I know I will get too much back no this :(]