Can retired partner claim under revenue code clerical error section after thirty-six year exit

Respected Advocates, Main apne elderly father (Senior Citizen, age around seventy-four years) ke liye urgent legal guidance chahti hoon. Pichhle chhah saalon se revenue courts ki lagatar peshiyon, unnecessary litigation aur procedural round-tripping ki wajah se mere father physical aur mental roop se bohot exhausted aur deeply stressed ho chuke hain. Case ki brief chronology aur facts is prakaar hain: **One. Partnership Firm, Initial Shares and Purchase (Nineteen Eighty-Four):** * **M/s Firm X** June nineteen eighty-four ko Indian Partnership Act, nineteen thirty-two ke tehat register hui thi. * **Initial Shares (Five Partners):** Registered partnership deed ke anusaar firm mein five partners (Partner A, B, C, D, E) the: * **Partner A (Mere Father):** Twenty-five percent share — Saath hi partnership deed ke clause ke tehat unhe business lead aur manage karne hetu **Managing Partner / Director** banaya gaya tha. * **Partner B:** Twenty percent share * **Partner C (Present Applicant):** Twenty percent share * **Partner D:** Twenty percent share * **Partner E:** Fifteen percent share * **Sale Deed Execution (July nineteen eighty-four):** Commercial land ki registered sale deed mein buyer/krayta is prakaar darj hua: > "M/s Firm X dwara bhagidaran Partner B aur Partner C". > > **Two. Mutation Register (Column Five vs Column Seven Reality):** * **Column Five Entry:** Mutation Panji ke Column Five (Krayta/Vivaran) mein *"dwara"* nahi likha hai, wahan sirf *"M/s Firm X bhagidaran Partner B aur Partner C"* likha hai. Ex-Partner C isi entry ko pakad kar claim kar raha hai ki uska vyaktigat naam Khasra mein darj hona chahiye tha aur na hona Patwari ki clerical error hai. * **Operative Judicial Order (Column Seven):** Reality yeh hai ki Tehsildar ne mutation panji ke Column Seven (Adesh) mein clear judicial order pass kiya tha ki bhoomi M/s Firm X ko bechi gayi hai, atah krayta M/s Firm X ke naam mutation sanction kiya jata hai. * **Revenue Records Continuity (Forty Years):** Lagatar pichhle forty saalon se Khasra/revenue records mein keval M/s Firm X hi sole Bhoomiswami darj chali aa rahi hai. Keval writ appeal interim period ke dauran ex-parte order operative tha. High Court dwara adverse revenue orders quash kiye jaane ke baad revenue records wapas status quo (keval M/s Firm X ke naam) par restore ho chuke hain. **Three. Complete Exit of Partner B and C and Firm Restructuring:** * **Nineteen Eighty-Six (Partner B ka Exit):** Partner B ne apna poora settlement bank cheque se receive karke firm se complete discharge liya aur exit kiya. * **Nineteen Eighty-Nine (Partner C and E ka Exit):** Partner C ne June nineteen eighty-nine ko apna poora capital aur profit settlement lekar firm se exit kiya. Partner C ne July nineteen eighty-nine ko sworn, registered affidavit execute karke declare kiya ki usne apne poore dues (One Lakh Fifty-Eight Thousand Rupees) prapt kar liye hain, uska firm ya uski kisi asset mein koi claim nahi bacha, aur statutory Form Five par sign kar diye. * **Reconstitution with Partner F and G:** Partner C ke nineteen eighty-nine exit ke baad, mere father ne business chalane ke liye do naye partners (Partner F aur Partner G) ko firm mein shamil kiya. Partner D bhi nineteen ninety-five mein exit ho gaya. * **Year Twenty-Seventeen (Exit of F and G):** Year twenty-seventeen mein Partner F aur Partner G ne bhi apna settlement lekar firm chhod di. **Four. Present State and Position of My Father (Sole Proprietor):** * Year twenty-seventeen mein Partner F aur G ke exit ke baad se, **mere father hi is enterprise ko lawfully as its Sole Proprietor run aur manage kar rahe hain**. * Commercial property par forty plus years se mere father ka hi peaceful, continuous aur undisturbed physical possession raha hai. Vahi is establishment ke sole custodian hain. **Five. Ex-Parte Proceeding Behind Our Back by Suppressing Exits:** * Firm se exit hone ke thirty-five saal baad, Partner C ne SDM ke samaksh Section one-one-five MPLRC (clerical error correction) ka aavedan lagaya. * Usne hume ya firm ko party hi nahi banaya, keval State ko party banaya. * **Total Suppression of Exits:** Apne aavedan mein usne is fact ko poori tarah conceal kiya ki Partner B aur wo khud Partner C poora financial settlement lekar kab ke firm se retire ho chuke hain. Court se exits chhipa kar usne peeche se ex-parte order karwa liya ki Khasra mein firm ke aage dono ka naam add kiya jaye. **Six. Appellate and High Court History:** * **First Appellate Court (Additional Collector):** Mere father ne appeal daali. Additional Collector ne SDM ka order set aside karte hue hold kiya ki mutation order (Column Seven) keval firm ke favour mein tha, thirty-six saal purana substantive record Section one-one-five mein modify nahi ho sakta, aur yeh matter Section one-one-five ke purview se bahar hai. * **High Court Judgment:** High Court ne hamari writ petition allow karke adverse orders ko set aside kiya kyunki M/s Firm X ek necessary party thi jise sunna aniwarya tha. High Court ne Partner C ko liberty di ki agar chahe toh firm ko party banakar afresh apply kare, par Court ne clearly clarify kiya ki usne maintainability aur merits par koi opinion express nahi kiya hai aur dono parties preliminary issues raise karne ke liye fully free hain. **Seven. Fresh Application, Still Hiding Facts and Twisting Reality (Current Issue):** * High Court ki liberty ki aad lekar, Partner C ne fir se Section one-one-five ka case SDM ke samaksh shuru kiya hai, jisme wo dobara Panji ke Column Five ke hawale se apna aur Partner B ka naam add karane ki maang kar raha hai. * **Still Hiding Facts:** Apne current aavedan mein bhi wo Partner B ke exit aur apne khud ke exit, settlement amount receipt, aur sworn exit affidavit ko completely hide kar raha hai. * **Twisting Facts:** Wo facts ko deliberately distort kar raha hai ki ye ek unregistered firm thi jisme keval do log (B aur C) vyapar karte the, jabki reality yeh hai ki initial registered partnership deed mein five partners the, jisme mere father Managing Partner/Director ke sath twenty-five percent share holder the. **Queries for Legal Strategy:** * Section Fourteen Indian Partnership Act, nineteen thirty-two aur Supreme Court ke Addanki Narayanappa ruling ke tahat, jab registry M/s Firm X dwara bhagidaran B aur C hui ho aur Column Seven ke judicial order se mutation keval M/s Firm X ke naam sanction hua ho, kya Panji ke Column Five ki descripttive entry ke basis par exit kar chuke Ex-Partner C ka summary Section one-one-five mein koi Locus Standi banta hai? * Formal exits aur sworn affidavit ko court se bar-bar chhipane (deliberate suppression of material facts) par kya SDM proceeding ko threshold par dismiss kiya ja sakta hai? * Aise persistent abuse of process aur ek senior citizen ko chhah saal se bar-bar court drag karne ke khilaf is proceeding ko permanently quash/stop karane ke liye sabse solid legal route kya hoga: High Court Writ (Prohibition / Certiorari under Article two-two-six / two-two-seven) ya Civil Court mein Injunction Suit based on estoppel? Senior advocates please guide karein.