,AS PER OLD PROVISIONS OF HINDUSUCCESSION ACT:
if the deceased had left him surviving a female relative specified in class I of the Schedule or a male relative specified in that class who claims through such female relative, the interest of the deceased in the Mitakshara coparcenary property shall devolve by testamentary or intestate succession, as the case may be, under this Act and not by survivorship.---
AND AS PER NEW AMENDMENT
(3) Where a Hindu dies after the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Amendment )Act, 2005, his interest in the property of a joint Hindu family governed by the Mitakshara law, shall devolve by the testamentary or intestate succession, as the case may be , under this Act and not by survivorship, and the coparcenary property shall be deemed to have been divided as if a partition had taken place and,- (a) the daughter is allotted the same share as is allotted to a son;--------
Can any body clerify the difference between old and new provisions with regard to entielement of females right to share in the copacenery property ?
what is the position with respect to self acquired property?
kindly share judgements of supreme court in this matters if any .
sc mittal