I have a question regarding the property distribution.
Facts are like-:
There is an ancestral property and technically there are four partners or I would say four family members between which the property should be divided but what happened was, first of all this property is a shop, so the family had given the shop to tenants and they were using the shop from last 8 years and they used to pay the rent to this family but after 5 years they stopped paying the rent because the shop was not working properly and when the family asked to give the shop back, they were not even ready for that so out of four members who were legally the heirs only one of them kept pursuing to get the shop back and others were not interested anymore.
Now, after three years of fighting for the shop, he has finally gotten the shop back through the help of the Court of Law.
What I want to ask is does the other three members still have the right over the shop because they all gave up on getting the shop back and he only did everything alone and also paid for all the financials and invested his time as well, so shouldn't he be the only one who should be considered as an owner of the shop?