Dear Experts,
To cut voluminous facts short…
What are the available remedies if Defendant refuses to admit, all e mail communication sent by himself before a trail Court in a civil suit? Entire merit of the case is based on e mail communication which are numerous in numbers and which goes against the Defendant if admits. Defendant in his written statement disagreed the E Mail ID belongs to him, in which all communication took place, as well as in the cross examination. Defendant is still using the same e mail ID. Defendant is highly educated and rich. Defendant had correspondence with the plaintiff more than two years on the same e mail ID.(Total number of e mails 80 in numbers) The plaintiff believes strongly that the defendant is having only one e mail ID.
Hence what are the possible remedies for the plaintiff to establish truth on record that the defended made false statement?
Where to initiate and how to go about?
Criminal proceedings are still going on. Civil case dismissed, The Court did not appreciate e mail communication at all, PARTICULARLY in the event of e mail ID ISSUE.
Hence, humble request to all Experts to contribute in the interest of Justice.
Thanking you all.
