dear prof. i had to write it because u deserved this.


well, go ahead with some PIL probably will earn u some professional mileage.

Total likes : 1 times


Thanks Mr. Kiran Kumar

I do wish that legal community jointly raise voice on this unjust adjustment by BCI, by mailing them, I have sent my query sheet and also nailing law ministry with writ to keep them out of wit




I need to apologise and clarify

Mr. Kiran kumar (partnership symbol 9379 points)

my post to reply you had reply to another senior kiran kumar from jalandhar who has his photo

I am sorry my reply covered you both 

this also proves, my thanking and no thanking is not to person but to posts. 

Kindly excuse me if i offended you by the rest of the post about what i must do,

i had a message from other kiran kumar, that i have to behvae professionally if i want to be a lawyer otherwise teach in AC rooms ( i d not know how it is assumed teaching is done in AC rooms by me).

reply to this mixed up with yours

when discussing with my friend suchitra i got this clarity

Sorry again. no offence meant even by saying no thanks

regards friend



1 week over. 

i have silence after my post except for Mr. Kiran kumar (partnerhip handinhand profile)

do i assume, my queries are just, with no counter

if so or else, please aid me giving your support and counter so writ can be prepared well


PS- if yes, please mails to

law ministry - cpio-la@nic.in,brahmavtar@nic.in

bar council INDIA bci.india@hub.nic.in, KARNATAKA  ksibal@sansad.nic.in

HRD minister ksibal@sansad.nic.in,kapil@kapilsibal.com

Sonia Gandhi soniagandhi@sansad.nic.in




Are we all talking of justice, accountability and responsibility only in seminars to get clap

Are we interested in these things in real life being clamped?

Have we become more self-centered to call India a spiritual capital?

Bar Council makes Rules which are

  1. Ultra vires the Act
  2. beyond power given under the Act
  3. not within functions prescribed under the Act
  4. retrospective law
  5. non-class legislation with no intelligible differentia
  6. language of drafting vague and makes no advocate practice without passing exams.

entire legal community is watching the fun and more, it claps hand saying it is good. 

Advocates are meant to fight for Justice.

Bar council is meant to carry out the same objective

Law ministry purpose is to ensure Justice to all as per Constitution

Courts are meant to deliver judgement beyond even written law and ensure justice 

But apart from prescribing duties to advocate in the Act, None seem to be interested in taking action to ensure that a section of the students/advocates (enrollment not barred) in violation of Article 14 and Article 19(1)g

I request all in the legal community to answer my  queries, in fact add to it

or bring out power, function of BCI to justify the rule interpret the rule and prove it is lawful

  • if not, fight for justice and ensure the resolution is withdrawn

Thank you Sirs


my last post on justification of bar council action and if unjust to fight is put up as a discussion in forum


kindly participate there



Averment not denied are admitted






Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


  Search Forum



Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query
CrPC MASTERCLASS!     |    x