Dear JSDN Sir,
Many thanks for your Suggestion.
The party had complained to Bar Council U/S 35 of Advocate Act. The Bar directed the Sr. Advocate and the Advocate to file there Affidavit in response to the complaint. In which the Both the counsel had taken a stand on Affidavit that " There was only one Affidavit which was filled, as the first Affidavit could not be affirmed, since the person who was the deponent could not come to the court".
To provide you the breif... The party was in appeal and the respondent tendered an affidavit in th open court without the permission of the court. The Respondent in this case handed over an un affirmed affidavit to the Party and this party sought time for the Hon'ble High court to file the counter affidavit.
Then as following the procedures the party tendered her counter in the Registry.
Subsequently one of the Learned Judges got promoted as cheif justice of another Hon'ble High court.
A copy of the Counter was handed over to the Advocates.
On seeing this counter, the Advoactes changed the contents of the Affidavit and filled another affodavit on the new Bench assingned to the case.
The Party took objection that there is already an affidavit and how they are filling the another affidavit.
Subsequently the case went to Bar as as DC No....
In the Bar council Party requested the Bar to check the AFfirmation register of the date. The told that it is not there responsibility and then the Party applied to the Hon'ble high court to provide the Affirmation record of the specified date. Subsequently party wrote letter to the Hon'ble Cheif Justice of India and the Cheif Justice of the Hon'ble High court. After this the party recived a letter from the Registrar General of the Hon'ble Supreme court " saying that she should approach the concerned court to collect the affirmation record" and upon the instruction of the Hon'ble Supreme court the Hon'ble High court was pleased to provide the affirmation record of the register of the specified date. There is an entry in the said affidavit which got affirmed on the specified date. As Hon'ble High court will not put an entry on there register whithout witnessing the deponent and collect the fees of Affirmation.
hence it is proved that the Deponent was present and the Adocates are lying in the Bar. A case is already in the Bar and Bar council of India. The Information has been sent to the Honble Cheif Justice of High court and Hon'ble Cheif Justice of India.
We are determined to fight this in Hon'ble Supreme court of India... as the Advocate are custodians to the custodians to the Liberty of the Citizens and a very heavy responsibilty is cast upon the advocates. The hon'ble courts should take a strong notice in this case, as this has not been done by a fresh student, it has been done by the advocates who claim to have unblemished record.
The SLP is already in Hon'ble Supreme court and already one contempt application has been moved.
We thank you for your suggestion and guidance. The real truth has been explained above.
