Links of blogs:
https://drdarakh.com/let-us-extract-money-from-the-doctor/
https://drdarakh.com/commercial-charges-on-a-dentist/
https://drdarakh.com/raja-balmiki-threatens-me-with-assault/
https://drdarakh.com/the-sordid-saga-of-my-maintenance-cheques-in-sangli-bank-account/
https://drdarakh.com/dadagiri-of-office-bearers/
https://drdarakh.com/first-do-not-accept-cheques-then-levy-penal-interest/
Greetings to all you eminent lawyers,
Through this query I seek your valuable opinion, views, inputs and feedback regarding my issues.
Brief History:- I am a practicing dental surgeon and society has been overbilling me in the name of commercial charges , levied fines on me , did not issue receipts for payments made, did not accept my maintenance cheques and thereafter levied penal interest. Finally, I filled a case u/s 91 of MCS act (see attachment) through my erstwhile lawyer.
Later on many lawyers opined that my prayers were not specific. Hence my current lawyer moved on application for amendment in prayers. The intention was to paint out to the court the exact details of overbilling etc. So that at the time of justice ( i.e the final verdict ) and the final judgement nothing is left out.
My current lawyer filled an application for amendment in prayers (see attachment). The court has rejected our application for amendment in prayers (see attachment)
Now my querY is : What should I do now? Should I go and appeal in the appellate court.? What are my options ?
Please note that the intention of amendment in prayers is to make the law fully aware of the details of overbilling so that at the time of verdict nothing is left out. This is because there is a possibility that the details of the overbilling are perhaps not described clearly in the original pleading.
2nd issue : The apartment was in my fathers name. He transferred it to my name by a gift deed in 2016. Society was not admitting me as a member. I moved the deputy registrars office and after 9 months of hearing Deputy registrar ruled in my favour and instructed society to admit me as a member. Society went to appeal in Divisional Joint Registrars office. There hearings are over and order is awaited.
I wanted my name to be added as disputant. The order says since DJR has asked for status quo I cannot be admitted as a member. But DJR has asked for status quo only for membership of the CHS and not this has nothing to do with ownership. The apartment is now in my name.
So I want my name to be added as disputant so that my father who is a senior citizen and has got nothing to do with the apartment is freed.
My erstwhile lawyer due to his error in judgement filed the case with my father as the disputant. He should have filed the case with me as the disputant.
Hope to see many responses and many thanks in advance for the same.
Regards,
Dr. Veerendra Darakh.
