Dhirender Kamal 19 May 2021
kavksatyanarayana (subregistrar/supdt.(retired)) 19 May 2021
You have not mentioned whether your grandfathers and their children are alive or not. Consult a local lawyer and file partition suit.
Sankaranarayanan (Advocate) 20 May 2021
Need more clarity on your query. better as pointed by expert to consult local lawyer
G.L.N. Prasad (Retired employee.) 20 May 2021
The fundamental aspect is that unless the property is divided in metes and bounds stating such parts of land with boundaries in the name of each co-sharer, the presumption is that the property is joint and undivided. The mutation entry is not relevant as the names mentioned in revenue records are at the most evidential value for possession and not exclusive/absolute title to the property. The name stated in the revenue records confirms that property is in the name of a co-sharer of undivided property. The property should be divided in equal proportions as per law among all co-sharers either through a family agreement or settlement deed. Local advocates can give precise guidance.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 20 May 2021
The property, if inherited by the grandfather and his two brothers, then it will devolve on them only.
Just because a third person got some papers signed by some of the shareholders, the other shareholders cannot be deprived their rights in the property.
Basically the properties can be divided into three shares with each brother acquiring one such equal share.
Now after this division, the respective legal heirs of the deceased shareholders can inherit their respective/legitimate share out of the share of the original shareholder.
If anyone is aggrieved by this act of one of the grandson, the aggrieved party can approach court of law with a suit for partition and for separate possession of his/her legitimate share in the properties.
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 21 May 2021
Originally posted by : Dhirender Kamal | ||
![]() |
my grandfather had 3 brothers gurdas(grandfather) jairam and tulsidas. tulsidas had only one son(mohan) who has only one son(neelmani).while gurdas had 4 sons and jairam had 3 sons. but in land there was no mention of Tulsidas in jambandi. so neelmani grandson of Tulsidas take sign of all the coshareers to do taksheem(they had no idea as they all are illetrate what they are signing).neelmani did take part of the land but now he wants more as he has written his name in jmabandi. but the land is in possession of sons of gurdas and jairam from 60 years. can they do something about it or have to give up the land | ![]() |
The partition of the property shall be equal between Gudas, Jairam and Tulsidas or their respective legal representatives if died.
Jamabandi cannot be in the sole name of Neelmani despite the fact other co-sharers are illetrate.
It would be better to consult and engage a local prudent lawyer for appreciation of facts/ documents, professional advise and necessary proceeding.
P. Venu (Advocate) 21 May 2021
It appears that you have taken special care to render the posting incomprehensible. What prevents you from posting the complete facts bringing out the real issue, if any, simple sentences.