Still going strong

You can file IA in the matter:

For ready reference theSubject Category is quoted below :

 LETTER PETITION & PIL MATTER - ECOLOGICAL IMBALANCE:PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION OF FORESTS THROUGH-OUT THE COUNTRY, PROTECTION OF WILD LIFE, BAN ON FELLING OF TREES AND FALLING OF UNDER GROUND WATER LEVEL

The case is very important Environmental Judgment of the Supreme Court delivered by Justice J.S.Verma and Justive B.N.Kirpal: I have read that case in BCI workshop in 2000 in Bhubaneswar, and it mainly pertain to Forsest conservation and setting up State Expert Committee, Report on Saw mill and closure of saw mill etc. Sir, will ypu please let me know what is actually happening with that Supreme Court Judgment?

Dear Mr.Assumi

Don't be worried.Nothing wrong is with Supreme Court judgment.

Actually Supreme Court's concern about the matters mentioned above is remarkable.Moreover related matters

have also been taken up and are being under consideration in high spirits.

So far as implementation it all depends upon various state governments and the central govt as well.

The latest judgment was regarding "Asiatic Wild Buffalo" delivered on 13.02.2012.

Some IAs are in the process and listed for 02.07.2012.

Matters regarding Iron Ore Mining and quarrying were also taken up in the judgments delivered.

On 2.7.2012 in most of the IAs filed SC allowed 2-3 weeks time to file statements/affidavits.However ,for some IAs the next date of listing is 9.7.2012

Next date for listing is 16.07.2012

on 13.07.2012 the court made the following order:

          " UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                               O R D E R


301.  I.A.NOs. 3306 IN W.P. (C) NO. 202 OF 1995

            Application for impleadment is allowed.


      I.A.NOs. 3307 IN W.P. (C) NO. 202 OF 1995

      Learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant has brought to  our
notice a letter dated  9th  August,  2010  written  by  the  Chief  Wildlife
Warden, Orissa requesting the  Principal  Secretary,  Forest  &  Environment
Department, Bhubaneswar to not sanction permission to M/S Tata  Refractories
Ltd., for carrying out mining activities covering 58.50 hectares  of  forest
area within Chandaka Wildlife Division in Cuttuck District. He submits  that
the said letter is still pending for consideration  of  the  Government  for
the last about two years.
       Learned  senior  counsel  has  further  submitted  that  the   mining
operations of the applicant remained suspended since  February,  2010,  even
though requisite deposits have already been made. He  further  submits  that
the  State  Government  is  neither  deciding  the  representations  of  the
applicant, nor sending its views to the  M.O.E.F.  and  not  permitting  the
applicant to resume mining operations.
      Having regard to the submissions made by learned  senior  counsel,  we
direct respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to consider the request  of  the  applicant  as
expeditiously as possible and dispose of the same within  a  period  of  two
months from the date of receipt of this order.
      The Registry  is  directed  to  transmit  a  copy  of  this  order  to
respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
      I.A. No. 3307 is disposed of accordingly.

302. IA No. 3419 in I.A. Nos. 2753-2754 in I.A. Nos. 1399 & 946
     in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995

      This is an application seeking reconsideration of this  Court's  order
dated 9th August, 2010.
      Having heard  learned  counsel  for  the  applicant  and  after  going
through the order of this Court dated 9th August, 2010, we  find  no  reason
to reconsider the same.
      The I.A. is accordingly dismissed.

303. IA Nos. 3403-3405 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
304. IA Nos. 3338-3340 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
305. IA Nos. 3341-3343 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
306. IA Nos. 3439-3441 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995

      All these applications may be listed along with  I.A.  Nos.  3399-3401
in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995.

307. I.A No. 100 in W.P.(C) No. 337 of 1995
      WITH
      IA No. 3452 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995

      Mr. P.S. Narasimha, learned Amicus Curiae has resumed his  submissions
at 2.30 p.m. which remained inconclusive when the Court rose  for  the  day.
The matters remained Part-Heard.
      List on Monday, the 23rd July, 2012.
MM-1 IA Nos. 3350-3352 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-2 IA Nos. 3374-3376 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-3 IA Nos. 3377-3379 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-4 IA Nos. 3380-3382 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-5 IA Nos. 3383-3385 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-6 IA Nos. 3386-3388 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-7 IA Nos. 3416-3418 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995


      List on Monday, the 30th July, 2012."
 

on 13.07.2012 the court made the following order:

          " UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                               O R D E R


301.  I.A.NOs. 3306 IN W.P. (C) NO. 202 OF 1995

            Application for impleadment is allowed.


      I.A.NOs. 3307 IN W.P. (C) NO. 202 OF 1995

      Learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant has brought to  our
notice a letter dated  9th  August,  2010  written  by  the  Chief  Wildlife
Warden, Orissa requesting the  Principal  Secretary,  Forest  &  Environment
Department, Bhubaneswar to not sanction permission to M/S Tata  Refractories
Ltd., for carrying out mining activities covering 58.50 hectares  of  forest
area within Chandaka Wildlife Division in Cuttuck District. He submits  that
the said letter is still pending for consideration  of  the  Government  for
the last about two years.
       Learned  senior  counsel  has  further  submitted  that  the   mining
operations of the applicant remained suspended since  February,  2010,  even
though requisite deposits have already been made. He  further  submits  that
the  State  Government  is  neither  deciding  the  representations  of  the
applicant, nor sending its views to the  M.O.E.F.  and  not  permitting  the
applicant to resume mining operations.
      Having regard to the submissions made by learned  senior  counsel,  we
direct respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to consider the request  of  the  applicant  as
expeditiously as possible and dispose of the same within  a  period  of  two
months from the date of receipt of this order.
      The Registry  is  directed  to  transmit  a  copy  of  this  order  to
respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
      I.A. No. 3307 is disposed of accordingly.

302. IA No. 3419 in I.A. Nos. 2753-2754 in I.A. Nos. 1399 & 946
     in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995

      This is an application seeking reconsideration of this  Court's  order
dated 9th August, 2010.
      Having heard  learned  counsel  for  the  applicant  and  after  going
through the order of this Court dated 9th August, 2010, we  find  no  reason
to reconsider the same.
      The I.A. is accordingly dismissed.

303. IA Nos. 3403-3405 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
304. IA Nos. 3338-3340 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
305. IA Nos. 3341-3343 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
306. IA Nos. 3439-3441 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995

      All these applications may be listed along with  I.A.  Nos.  3399-3401
in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995.

307. I.A No. 100 in W.P.(C) No. 337 of 1995
      WITH
      IA No. 3452 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995

      Mr. P.S. Narasimha, learned Amicus Curiae has resumed his  submissions
at 2.30 p.m. which remained inconclusive when the Court rose  for  the  day.
The matters remained Part-Heard.
      List on Monday, the 23rd July, 2012.
MM-1 IA Nos. 3350-3352 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-2 IA Nos. 3374-3376 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-3 IA Nos. 3377-3379 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-4 IA Nos. 3380-3382 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-5 IA Nos. 3383-3385 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-6 IA Nos. 3386-3388 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995
MM-7 IA Nos. 3416-3418 in W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995


      List on Monday, the 30th July, 2012."